Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "state_ioreq_non".
Did you mean:
state_ioreq_none
2013 Nov 26
6
[PATCH v5] x86: properly handle MSI-X unmask operation from guests
...ccording to Andrew Cooper''s comments
v5:Some changes according to Jan''s comments, including
a) remove "valid" field, use "ctrl_address" itself to judge if there is a valid
pending msix unmask operation
b) Call msix_post_handler() when (p->state == STATE_IOREQ_NONE), which
means it gets executed only upon completion of I/O
From de586050612f2fbe6fbb46065c2a84069c52009e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:43:48 -0500
Subject: [PATCH v5] x86: properly handle MSI-X unmask operation from guests
For a...
2013 Nov 22
10
[PATCH v4] x86: properly handle MSI-X unmask operation from guests
.../io.c
index deb7b92..6c83c25 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c
@@ -297,6 +297,9 @@ void hvm_io_assist(ioreq_t *p)
break;
}
+ if ( msix_post_handler(curr) )
+ gdprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "msix_post_handler error\n");
+
if ( p->state == STATE_IOREQ_NONE )
vcpu_end_shutdown_deferral(curr);
}
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmsi.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmsi.c
index 4826b4a..2cdd0dc 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmsi.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmsi.c
@@ -293,7 +293,11 @@ static int msixtbl_write(struct vcpu *v, unsigned long address,
/* exi...
2013 Sep 23
57
[PATCH RFC v13 00/20] Introduce PVH domU support
This patch series is a reworking of a series developed by Mukesh
Rathor at Oracle. The entirety of the design and development was done
by him; I have only reworked, reorganized, and simplified things in a
way that I think makes more sense. The vast majority of the credit
for this effort therefore goes to him. This version is labelled v13
because it is based on his most recent series, v11.