Displaying 20 results from an estimated 22 matches for "stat2".
Did you mean:
state
2010 Jun 24
1
?to calculate sth for groups defined between points in one variable (string), / value separating/ spliting variable into groups by i.e. between start, NA, NA, stop1, start2, NA, stop2
..."Stop2")
C.df<-data.frame(cbind(c0,c1,c2,c3,c4))
colnames(C.df)<-c("c0","c1","c2","c3","c4")
C.df$c5<-paste(C.df$c3,C.df$c4,sep="-")
C.df
# NEEDED RESULTS
# needed result
# for Stat1-Stop1: mean(20,30,40,50)
# for Stat2-Stop2: mean(c(10,60,20,30,40,50,30,10,0,NA,20,10.3444), na.rm=T)
#mean:
c1 c3 c4 c5
20 Start1 Stop1 Start1-Stop1
25.48585 Start2 Stop2 Start2-Stop2
#sum
# for Stat1-Stop1: sum(20,30,40,50)
# for Stat2-Stop2: sum(c(10,60,20,30,40,50,30,10,0,NA,20,10.3444), na...
2015 Oct 22
2
[PATCH] Added btrfs support for vfs_min_size.
...dlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
+#include <mntent.h>
+#include <sys/stat.h>
+#include <sys/types.h>
#include "daemon.h"
#include "actions.h"
+static char*
+get_mount_point (const char *device)
+{
+ FILE *fp;
+ struct mntent *m;
+ struct stat stat1, stat2;
+ char *path;
+
+ if (stat (device, &stat1) == -1) {
+ reply_with_perror ("stat: %s", device);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ /* NB: Eventually we should aim to parse /proc/self/mountinfo, but
+ * that requires custom parsing code.
+ */
+ fp = setmntent ("/proc/mounts&quo...
2018 Apr 10
0
[PATCH v2 3/5] daemon: move Lvm.lv_canonical to new Lvm_utils module
...e we are passed matches any of them.
- *
- * Note use of 'stat' instead of 'lstat' so that symlinks are fully
- * resolved.
- *)
-let lv_canonical device =
- let stat1 = stat device in
- let lvs = lvs () in
- try
- Some (
- List.find (
- fun lv ->
- let stat2 = stat lv in
- stat1.st_rdev = stat2.st_rdev
- ) lvs
- )
- with
- | Not_found -> None
diff --git a/daemon/lvm.mli b/daemon/lvm.mli
index e9a6faeca..592168433 100644
--- a/daemon/lvm.mli
+++ b/daemon/lvm.mli
@@ -17,13 +17,3 @@
*)
val lvs : unit -> string list
-
-val lv_...
2012 Sep 17
2
Creating missingness in repeated measurement data
...d (that states
the exact time this
happened from the stop variable). By this I mean dat2 that looks like,
id <- rep(a, c(3,2,3))
sta2<- c(1,1,NA,1,NA,1,NA,NA)
g2<- c(0,0,NA,0,NA,0,NA,NA)
stop2 <- c(1,2,NA,2,NA,1,NA,NA)
d <- c(4,4,NA,4,NA,1.5,NA,NA)
dat2 <- data.frame(id=id, stat2=sta2, g2=g2,stop2=stop2,d=d).
Thank you very much!
John
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2003 Oct 24
1
gee and geepack: different results?
...obust z
(Intercept) 0.411995251 0.174052364 2.36707644 0.131632816 3.12988253
TR8 -0.001154422 0.021191593 -0.05447549 0.011807163 -0.09777305
TR9 0.019559907 0.024379471 0.80231056 0.008993803 2.17482050
TR11 -0.041092894 0.021609580 -1.90160537 0.015384050 -2.67113620
STAT2 0.023886745 0.014219390 1.67987130 0.013543550 1.76369899
STAT3 0.045749728 0.016844262 2.71604237 0.012862504 3.55682917
temp -0.020141682 0.008819798 -2.28368975 0.006851784 -2.93962600
eta 0.008021081 0.001465212 5.47434944 0.001129986 7.09838725
Estimated Sc...
2015 Oct 23
0
Re: [PATCH] Added btrfs support for vfs_min_size.
...const char *device)
> +{
This function now exists in daemon/mount.c and here. It should
be shared. Just make the function in daemon/mount.c non-static,
and declare it in daemon/guestfsd.h, and you don't need the copy.
> + FILE *fp;
> + struct mntent *m;
> + struct stat stat1, stat2;
> + char *path;
> +
> + if (stat (device, &stat1) == -1) {
> + reply_with_perror ("stat: %s", device);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + /* NB: Eventually we should aim to parse /proc/self/mountinfo, but
> + * that requires custom parsing code.
>...
2011 Apr 27
3
[LLVMdev] Can I get the binary address of a for-loop statement?
Hi, all
What I want to do is to locate the range of a for-loop statement in
a binary. For example, given a for-loop statement belows,
for (stat1; stat2; stat3) {
/* do something */
}
Is it possible to get information about the range (binary address)
of the above for-loop, say, 0x0100 - 0x0120.
One idea comes up in my mind is adding passes to retrieve such
information in LLVM, then use llvm-gcc to compile the code.
Any suggestion appreci...
2013 Mar 07
5
multiple plots and looping assistance requested (revised codes)
Hi Irucka,
I tried it and was able to plot it without any errors.? Here, your code indicates you need two lines. temper[[i]][1]
?temper[[1]][1] # which is the column 1.
? Month
1???? 1
2???? 2
3???? 3
?temper[[1]][2]
#? Data1
#1?? 1.5
#2? 12.3
#3? 11.4
Suppose I use names(temper) instead of seq_along(temper)
pdf("irucka.pdf")
?lapply(names(temper),function(i)
2010 Mar 22
1
maxNR - Error in p(a, b) : element 1 is empty; the part of the args list of '*' being evaluated was: (b, t)
...read the data from the website and then peform
maxNR on the function, F. Btw the version of R being used is "RGui for
Windows" if it helps to know this.
R-code below:
library(maxLik)
> require(maxLik)
>
> x <-
> read.table('http://www.math.ku.dk/kurser/2008-09/blok4/stat2/doku/data/Eksempel_6_3.txt',
> header = TRUE);
> t <- log(x$Koncentration);
> X <- x$Status;
>
> p <- function(a,b) exp(a+b*t)/(1+exp(a+b*t));
> S <- sum(X);
> SP <- sum(t*X);
>
> F <- function(a,b) {
+ c(sum(p(a,b)) - S,
+ sum(t*p(a,b))...
2011 Apr 27
0
[LLVMdev] Can I get the binary address of a for-loop statement?
...ttp://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html for an overview.
Regards,
-Jim
On Apr 26, 2011, at 7:57 PM, 陳韋任 wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> What I want to do is to locate the range of a for-loop statement in
> a binary. For example, given a for-loop statement belows,
>
> for (stat1; stat2; stat3) {
> /* do something */
> }
>
> Is it possible to get information about the range (binary address)
> of the above for-loop, say, 0x0100 - 0x0120.
>
> One idea comes up in my mind is adding passes to retrieve such
> information in LLVM, then use llvm-gcc to compil...
2012 Mar 09
5
[PATCH 0/5] Fixes to resize2fs (RHBZ#755729, RHBZ#801640)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755729
This bug reports that the error message printed by the resize2fs API
calls (which comes directly from the resize2fs command) says:
Please run 'e2fsck -f /dev/vda1' first.
That command is not possible from guestfish (where it would be
'e2fsck-f' or 'e2fsck ... forceall:true').
Fixing that bug caused this bug:
2018 Apr 10
9
[PATCH v2 0/5] daemon: generate almall the API OCaml interfaces
Hi,
as a followup for the signature fix for mount_vfs [1], here it is a
patch series to generate automatically all the OCaml interfaces of
daemon actions.
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-April/msg00059.html
Thanks,
Pino Toscano (5):
daemon: directly use Optgroups
daemon: use the structs from the Structs module
daemon: move Lvm.lv_canonical to new Lvm_utils module
2002 Sep 19
5
how to use if statement in function correctly
Dear all
I try to persuade if statement in my function to work as I want (but I am not very
successful:(
My question is why my function with if statement is evaluated correctly in case of
atomic variables and incorrectly in case of vector variables.
Here is an example:
#function with if statement
fff <- function(otac,sklon)
{
test <- (otac *
2011 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Can I get the binary address of a for-loop statement?
...an overview.
>
> Regards,
> -Jim
>
> On Apr 26, 2011, at 7:57 PM, 陳韋任 wrote:
>
>> Hi, all
>>
>> What I want to do is to locate the range of a for-loop statement in
>> a binary. For example, given a for-loop statement belows,
>>
>> for (stat1; stat2; stat3) {
>> /* do something */
>> }
>>
>> Is it possible to get information about the range (binary address)
>> of the above for-loop, say, 0x0100 - 0x0120.
>>
>> One idea comes up in my mind is adding passes to retrieve such
>> information in...
2005 Sep 16
0
lastest spandsp-0.03pre1 don't compile
...t.c:201: warning: `return' with a value, in function returning void
tpkt.c:205: error: `t' undeclared (first use in this function)
tpkt.c: In function `tpkt_rx_packet':
tpkt.c:241: warning: implicit declaration of function `decode_open_type'
tpkt.c:211: warning: unused variable `stat2'
tpkt.c:212: warning: unused variable `i'
tpkt.c:213: warning: unused variable `j'
udptl.c: In function `udptl_process_packet':
udptl.c:150: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void
udptl.c: In function `udptl_build_packet':
udptl.c:541: warning: i...
2002 Oct 21
4
mixed effect-models
Hello,
?
I believe that in R, it is not possible to analyze mixed effect-models
when the distribucion is not gaussian (p.e. binomial or poisson), isn't?
?
Somebody can suggest me alternative?
?
thanks
?
xavi
?
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info",
2014 Feb 25
2
[PATCH supermin v4] Supermin 5 rewrite.
...{ /* "/foo/bar" */
- dirname = strndup (orig_filename, p-orig_filename);
- basename = p+1;
-
- /* If the parent directory is a symlink to another directory, then
- * we want to look up the target directory. (RHBZ#698089).
- */
- struct stat stat1, stat2;
- if (lstat (dirname, &stat1) == 0 && S_ISLNK (stat1.st_mode) &&
- stat (dirname, &stat2) == 0 && S_ISDIR (stat2.st_mode)) {
- char *new_dirname = malloc (PATH_MAX+1);
- ssize_t r = readlink (dirname, new_dirname, PATH_MAX+1);
- if (r == -1)...
2017 Jul 27
23
[PATCH v3 00/23] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml.
I think this fixes everything mentioned:
- Added the Optgroups module as suggested.
- Remove command temporary files.
- Replace command ~flags with ?fold_stdout_on_stderr.
- Nest _with_mounted function.
- Rebase & retest.
Rich.
2017 Jul 21
27
[PATCH v2 00/23] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml.
v1 was posted here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html
This series now depends on two small patches which I posted separately:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html
v1 -> v2:
- Previously changes to generator/daemon.ml were made incrementally
through the patch
2017 Jul 14
45
[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml.
Previously posted as part of the mega utilities/inspection
series here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00232.html
What I've done is to extract just the parts related to rewriting
daemon APIs in OCaml, rebase them on top of the current master, fix a
few things, and recompile and test everything.
Rich.