search for: staszak

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 62 matches for "staszak".

2009 Aug 22
2
[LLVMdev] PR4174
On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:27 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> > wrote: >> >> On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Aug 21, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Eli Fried...
2009 Aug 22
2
[LLVMdev] PR4174
On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> > wrote: >> >> On Aug 21, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Aug 21, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Eli Friedm...
2009 Aug 22
0
[LLVMdev] PR4174
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:27 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >>> >>>> On F...
2009 Aug 21
1
[LLVMdev] PR4174
On Aug 21, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> > wrote: >> >> On Aug 21, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>&gt...
2009 Aug 22
0
[LLVMdev] PR4174
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 21, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >>> >>>> On Fr...
2010 Aug 06
2
[LLVMdev] PR5373
...rate FALSE value. I know that this comment might be a little bit misleading. Probably the best idea is to delete it. > doesn't do what the comment says it does; the store into *Val is done when !LoopExitBB, not when LoopExitBB == LoopExitBB2. > > On Aug 6, 2010, at 12:54 AMPDT, Jakub Staszak wrote: > >> Hello again :) >> >> It's been some time since I sent you last patch, but here I'm again. I send the patch for PR5373. >> >> Regards >> -- >> Jakub Staszak > <pr5373.patch> >> >> _____________________________...
2009 Aug 21
3
[LLVMdev] PR4174
Hello, This patch fixes PR4174. Two test-cases included: original one from bugzilla and a little bit complicated made be myself. It seems that LoopIndexSplit doesn't handle some cases, I'll try to send some patch this week. Regards -- Jakub Staszak -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pr4174.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 3229 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090821/0e07e86f/attachment.obj>
2009 Aug 22
0
[LLVMdev] PR4174
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > On Aug 21, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 21, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri...
2010 Aug 11
0
[LLVMdev] PR5373
Hello, Fixed patch attached. Can anyone test it? Regards -- Jakub Staszak -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pr5373.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 5846 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100811/8c0c364b/attachment.obj> -------------- next part ----------...
2010 Aug 06
2
[LLVMdev] PR5373
Hello again :) It's been some time since I sent you last patch, but here I'm again. I send the patch for PR5373. Regards -- Jakub Staszak -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pr5373.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 5913 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100806/75f6e44a/attachment.obj>
2009 Nov 27
2
[LLVMdev] PR5373
...:28 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: > Hello, > > I haven't studied this in detail, but at a first look this makes the > code inconsistent with the associated comments. Why should the code > continue recursing past a loop exit? > > Dan > > On Nov 23, 2009, at 4:43 AM, Jakub Staszak <kuba at gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> This patch fixes pr5373, testcase of course attached. >> >> -Jakub >> <5373.patch> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs....
2009 Dec 06
1
[LLVMdev] PR5373
...On Nov 30, 2009, at 7:52 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: > Hello, > > Simply removing that "return true" causes the code to search > blocks outside of loops for side effects. That's not > what the code is supposed to do. > > Dan > > On Nov 27, 2009, at 3:01 AM, Jakub Staszak wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Because of this "return true" not every block was visited and only >> one ExitBB was found (instead of two). Thus, loop was optimized as >> a trivial one, which was wrong. >> >> -Jakub >> >> On Nov 24, 2009...
2009 Nov 30
0
[LLVMdev] PR5373
Hello, Simply removing that "return true" causes the code to search blocks outside of loops for side effects. That's not what the code is supposed to do. Dan On Nov 27, 2009, at 3:01 AM, Jakub Staszak wrote: > Hi, > > Because of this "return true" not every block was visited and only one ExitBB was found (instead of two). Thus, loop was optimized as a trivial one, which was wrong. > > -Jakub > > On Nov 24, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: > >> Hell...
2010 May 08
2
[LLVMdev] PR7052
Hello, This patch fixes PR7052. Regards -- Jakub Staszak -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pr7052.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 3223 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100508/4648de5a/attachment.obj>
2010 Aug 06
0
[LLVMdev] PR5373
...se if (Val) { + // if LoopExitBB == LoopExitBB2 pick the first one (true). + *Val = ConstantInt::getFalse(Context); doesn't do what the comment says it does; the store into *Val is done when !LoopExitBB, not when LoopExitBB == LoopExitBB2. On Aug 6, 2010, at 12:54 AMPDT, Jakub Staszak wrote: > Hello again :) > > It's been some time since I sent you last patch, but here I'm again. > I send the patch for PR5373. > > Regards > -- > Jakub Staszak -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pr5373.patch Type:...
2009 Aug 06
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] PR4667
Hello, This patch fixes PR4667. Regards, Jakub Staszak P.S. ping: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-July/024369.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pr4667.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2148 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachm...
2009 Aug 24
2
[LLVMdev] PR3913
Hello, This (quite big :-)) patch fixes PR3913. Regards -- Jakub Staszak -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pr3913.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1451 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090824/e9d36629/attachment.obj>
2009 Oct 10
2
[LLVMdev] PR3707
Hello, I'm back :) This patch fixes pr3707. Regards -Jakub -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pr3707.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 3247 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091010/301a2761/attachment.obj>
2009 Oct 12
0
[LLVMdev] PR3707
On Oct 10, 2009, at 7:48 AM, Jakub Staszak wrote: > Hello, > > I'm back :) Great! > This patch fixes pr3707. Can you explain a little more what this does? What is the intuition behind disabling this optimization? -Chris
2009 Nov 23
3
[LLVMdev] PR5373
Hello, This patch fixes pr5373, testcase of course attached. -Jakub -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 5373.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1540 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091123/3f8fe7b3/attachment.obj>