search for: starynkevitch

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 56 matches for "starynkevitch".

2009 May 01
6
[LLVMdev] open source multithreaded garbage collector suitable for LLVM applications?
...oc). And it is well known that coding concurrent GC is quite hard, much harder than coding a single-threaded GC. And with LLVM, adapting to the constraints of the GC is easier. Are there people using LLVM in multi-threaded applications with some other GC than Boehm's? Regards. -- Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/ email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359 8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France *** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***
2012 Jun 15
22
[Bug 51144] New: significant pixel corruption in text
...roduct: xorg Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: basile at starynkevitch.net QAContact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Created attachment 63099 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=63099 photo of screen portion with corrupted text pixels (perhaps bug similar to 20363) with latest git of xf86-video-nouveau: commit 36d3f8c28c55c05ccf4efa985831d2...
2007 May 10
0
[LLVMdev] 2.0 Release Process
...se branch. > > May 21st - Release! > What about the migration to SubVersion? Is it related to release of LLVM2.0? How will the svn migration happen? When should it be preferable or possible to use the svn command (instead of cvs) to get the latest LLVM source code? Regards -- Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/ email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359 8, rue de la Faïencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France *** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***
2007 Oct 22
2
[LLVMdev] Q: missing -fPIC in llvmc?
...no way to generate position independent code in shared object (i.e. to output files which are easy dlopen-able without pain)? I probably missed something obvious, but what? I want to compile LLVM assembly source code -suitably generated- into .so as directly as possible... Regards -- Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/ email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359 8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France *** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***
2007 May 03
3
[LLVMdev] which g++ to compile LLVM CVS on Linux/AMD64?
...e LLVM and that some others compile it wrongly (producing buggy code)? Why can't g++-4.1 be used? FWIW, the latest gcc snapshot from yesterday gcc version 4.3.0 20070501 (experimental) fail to compile latest LLVM (with compile errors!). Is LLVM bootstraped thru g++-llvm? Regards -- Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/ email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359 8, rue de la Faïencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France *** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***
2007 Jun 29
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM assembly without basic block
Thank you for this reply. If so, is there any way to merge basic blocks into a single one? Thanks, Seung J. Lee ---- Original message ---- >Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:27:38 +0200 >From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile at starynkevitch.net> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM assembly without basic block >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >Seung Jae Lee wrote: >> Hello, guys. >> >> I just wonder if there is any way to spit out LLVM assembly...
2007 May 09
2
[LLVMdev] 2.0 Release Process
The release branch has been created and the llvm-gcc mirror updated (thanks Bill!). I will be doing some preliminary testing before I request the help of the community to test the release. During this time, I ask that developers only commit documentation changes to the release branch and email the list with any bug fixes that need to be merged into the release branch. Bug fixes have to be
2007 Oct 22
2
[LLVMdev] Q: missing -fPIC in llvmc?
Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: >> On a Debian/AMD64 host I am surprised that there is apparently no way to >> generate position independent code in shared object (i.e. to output >> files which are easy dlopen-able without pain)? >> >> I probably missed something obvious, but what? > >...
2008 Jul 20
1
[LLVMdev] generating a shared object from a single *.ll (LLVM) source?
...un gcc -fPIC -shared -O chello.c -o chello.so I thought that, assuming I have one llvm source ehello.ll, the equivalent would be llvmc2 -opt ehello.ll -o ehello.so but it is not that simple. Any clues ? May I also suggest to document it in the man pages or the --help output? -- Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/ email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359 8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France *** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***
2007 May 03
1
[LLVMdev] which g++ to compile LLVM CVS on Linux/AMD64?
Le Thu, May 03, 2007 at 09:36:22AM -0700, Chris Lattner écrivait/wrote: > On Thu, 3 May 2007, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: > > > > > FWIW, the latest gcc snapshot from yesterday gcc version 4.3.0 20070501 > > (experimental) fail to compile latest LLVM (with compile errors!). > > Please file an llvm bug report with these errors. It may be that we are > doing something illegal in...
2004 Nov 07
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM for JIT only use
...JIT/HowToUseJIT.cpp and other similar examples. I want to use LLVM directly from its C++ API to build the "bytecode" tree (actually the sequence or tree of LLVM instructions), so I really don't need any C or C++ parser. (FWIW, I did know and use GNU lightning) Regards. -- Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/ email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net aliases: basile<at>tunes<dot>org = bstarynk<at>nerim<dot>net 8, rue de la Faïencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
2007 May 12
3
[LLVMdev] reading a module from a memory string (BitCode)
...me and id), or not... Does any one have some example of reading Bitcode encoded modules? Can I assume that such modules are not tied to a particular (LLVM target) architecture, in other words can I store into my database modules build on AMD64 and reload them on x86 (32 bits)? Regards. -- Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/ email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359 8, rue de la Faïencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France *** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***
2004 Nov 07
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM for JIT only use
Hello List, (apparently this list is moderated) Le/On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 03:45:41PM -0600, Misha Brukman écrivait/wrote: > On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 10:33:09PM +0100, Basile STARYNKEVITCH > wrote: Basile>> I want to try to use LLVM only for JIT only use (generating code in Basile>> memory for x86 and, when available PowerPC [32bits]) If you want to know I am experimenting some JIT generation for a experimental toy functional language [this is only a hobby] and I did...
2007 Jun 29
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM assembly without basic block
...into 'for' statements when several 'for's are used in HLL. This is why I asked that. I should have asked you more clear. Sorry for any misunderstanding I might have caused. Thanks, Seung J. Lee ---- Original message ---- >Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 23:14:10 +0200 >From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile at starynkevitch.net> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM assembly without basic block >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >Seung Jae Lee wrote: >> Thank you for this reply. >> If so, is there any way to merge basic blocks into a sin...
2007 Oct 22
0
[LLVMdev] Q: missing -fPIC in llvmc?
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: > On a Debian/AMD64 host I am surprised that there is apparently no way to > generate position independent code in shared object (i.e. to output > files which are easy dlopen-able without pain)? > > I probably missed something obvious, but what? You're missing the fact th...
2007 May 13
1
[LLVMdev] reading a module from a memory string (BitCode)
Le Sat, May 12, 2007 at 04:42:49PM -0700, Chris Lattner écrivait/wrote: > On Sat, 12 May 2007, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: > > with the latest LLVM (almost 2.0 CVS) what is the right way to read a module > > from a byte array fetched from a database? > > The bitcode reader will read from any MemoryBuffer object. There are a > variety of static methods on MemoryBuffer to create them from f...
2009 May 02
0
[LLVMdev] open source multithreaded garbage collector suitable for LLVM applications?
Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: > Does any know about some opensource multithread-compatible (or > concurrent) garbage collector library, if possible suitable for LLVM? > > (I mean that I want several mutator threads; the collector can be > stoptheworld or concurrent ....) > > H.Boehm's conser...
2007 Jun 15
3
[LLVMdev] migration to SubVersion successful or delayed?
...org/docs/GettingStarted.html#checkout suggest to switch to svn instead of cvs. What is the current best way to download the latest snapshot: cvs or svn? I probably missed some obvious announcement but nothing in June 2007 on http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-announce/ Regards. -- Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/ email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359 8, rue de la Faïencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France *** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***
2007 Nov 03
3
[LLVMdev] performance of LLVM?
...observed? Are there today some opensource programs which generate big LLVM assembly files? NB: in this email, a code generator means actually a complex program which transform a high level language (Prolog, Haskell, Scheme, ...) into a lower level one (C or LLVM assembly or C--). -- Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/ email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359 8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France *** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***
2004 Nov 28
1
[LLVMdev] PowerPC JIT available for testing
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 10:27, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: > Le Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 12:00:03PM -0600, Chris Lattner écrivait/wrote: > > > > > > This is just a note to mention that the PowerPC JIT is now operational and > > begging for testing in mainline CVS. There is one known problem (below), > > but otherwise...