search for: startrecoveri

Thanks Martin! We are using the ctdb 4.6.10. Are you able to recreate this every time? Sometimes? Rarely? Rarely. Note that you're referring to nodes 1, 2, 3 while CTDB numbers the nodes 0, 1, 2. In fact, the situation is a little more confused than this: This is my wrong. The CTDB numbers the nodes is 0,1,2. # ctdb status Number of nodes:3 pnn:0 10.231.8.70 OK pnn:1 10.231.8.68 OK

Thanks Martin! We are using the ctdb 4.6.10. Are you able to recreate this every time? Sometimes? Rarely? Rarely. Note that you're referring to nodes 1, 2, 3 while CTDB numbers the nodes 0, 1, 2. In fact, the situation is a little more confused than this: This is my wrong. The CTDB numbers the nodes is 0,1,2. # ctdb status Number of nodes:3 pnn:0 10.231.8.67 OK pnn:1 10.231.8.65 OK

Thanks Martin. --------------------------------------------------- Re: [Samba] [ctdb]Unable to run startrecovery event On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 14:24:12 +0800 (CST), "zhu.shangzhong--- via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I have checked more logs. > Before ctdb-eventd went away, system memory utilization is very high, almost 100%. > Is it related to "Bad talloc

Martin, I have checked more logs. Before ctdb-eventd went away, system memory utilization is very high, almost 100%. Is it related to "Bad talloc magic value - wrong talloc version used/mixed"? 2018/08/14 15:22:57.818762 ctdb-eventd[10131]: 05.system: WARNING: System memory utilization 95% >= threshold 80% 2018/08/14 15:22:57.818800 ctdb-eventd[10131]: 05.system: WARNING: System

There is a 3 nodes ctdb cluster is running. When one of 3 nodes is powered down, lots of logs will be wrote to log.ctdb. node1: repeat logs: 2018/09/04 04:35:06.414369 ctdbd[10129]: Recovery has started 2018/09/04 04:35:06.414944 ctdbd[10129]: connect() failed, errno=111 2018/09/04 04:35:06.415076 ctdbd[10129]: Unable to run startrecovery event node2: repeat logs: 2018/09/04 04:35:09.412368

Hello all, I've some CTDB issue which I'm not sure where to start... I follow this guide by steve which is nice. The different on what have is that I don't have drbd running... Also I've 4 x GE which is all Connected to a switch with different ip but same subnet This is suppose to load balance the traffic as under samba dns, they all have the same name. I'm only planing 3

Hi, I am setting up a two node Samba cluster with CTDB in AWS in two different subnets. All IP ports are open between these two subnets. I am initially forming the Samba cluster with one node, then will add the second node after startup of CTDB. I am not using public_addresses for CTDB due to AWS not supporting VIP's. I am using 64bit Amazon Linux with two NICs defined, eth0 as the