search for: startbut

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "startbut".

Did you mean: startbit
2014 Nov 09
0
Master Works, Slave Does Not
...13s latency).PORT STATE SERVICE3493/tcp closed nut Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 11.06 seconds Which tells me this port is configured for nut but it is closed? I have rebooting and starting and stopping the service using: sudo service ups-monitor stop sudo service ups-monitor startBut it remains closed. 3) Assuming this should be open how do I fix this? Thank you for any help - Steve -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20141109/757ba53b/attachment.html&g...
2014 Nov 10
0
Master Works, Slave Does Not
...but it is closed? As mentioned above, that is expected. But if you run it against the master (192.168.0.7, if I understand correctly) from the slave, you should see that it is open. I have rebooting and starting and stopping the service using: sudo service ups-monitor stop sudo service ups-monitor startBut it remains closed. 3) Assuming this should be open how do I fix this? You mentioned that you have a "LISTEN 0.0.0.0" line in upsd.conf on the master - has upsd been restarted since that change was made? Other than that, you should be set. Do things match the "netstat" output I m...
2014 Nov 08
2
Master Works, Slave Does Not
On Nov 8, 2014, at 1:52 PM, Steve Read <sd_read at hotmail.com> wrote: > I have made changes but it is still the same. That is when the server gets the lowbat/noAC signal it does shut down as expected but the slave does not. > > Perhaps it makes sense for me to list the present settings: > > On the Master: > > nut.conf > MODE=netserver > >
2014 Nov 09
2
Master Works, Slave Does Not
On Nov 9, 2014, at 3:48 PM, Steve Read <sd_read at hotmail.com> wrote: > I would like to verify my understanding keeping in mind I have a one master and one slave computer. > > When the master gets the low batt/noAC signal it initiates a broadcast packet(s) on port 3493. > > 1) Is this correct? No, the slave computer's upsmon process connects to the master (via TCP, so