search for: stankovic

...d decodeInstruction is called with DecoderTableMicroMips16 and only if it fails we read 4 bytes and call decodeInstruction with DecoderTableMicroMips32. Regards, Zoran ________________________________ From: Daniel Sanders Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2014 5:49 PM To: Jun Koi; Vladimir Medic; Sasa Stankovic; Jozef Kolek; Zoran Jovanovic Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: RE: Mips's MicroMips ?? Hi, I've had a quick look through MipsDisassembler.cpp and it seems that the disassembler doesn't know anything about 16-bit instructions at the moment. The two main problems are that DecoderTabl...

I've got about 10,000 docs I'd like to devise a search/index for. I found a perl script called Perlfect that can do that on an old P3 but at the astronomical time of 7 hours. Another script(cgi/perl) at hotscripts can do the same but allows the "rm -rf /" exploit. DoH!? Is there anything perl/flatfile that can search/index faster? This is a nice job for an aging P3 in the

firefox-1.5.0.2-2.1.c4.centos.i386.rpm in the testing repo produces this error when running it as non-rrot and also as root Firefox could not install this item because "install.rdf" (provided by the item) is not well formed or does not exist. Please contact the author about this problem. How to reproduce this message :- 1. download and upgrade firefox-1.5.0.2-2.1.c4.centos.i386.rpm

The docs in http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/docs/ do not reflect yum of today ie the yum plugins. Where can updated yum docs be found? By browsing lists such as fedora-devel, centos one can see how the plugins have "stumbled in" but newbies/anyone wanting to pickup on the new features has nothing to read. Note there are yumex docs at the above location but my query relates to yum $

Unless its an April Fools joke, the web interface shows the source code rather than the messages. An oversight or a compromise? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

Seeing Fedora have released 1.5.0.3 for fc5 isn't it time for CentOS to rebuild 1.5.0.3 for CentOSPlus or does the current rpm have the patches? I recall last times goof in FC5 firefox appearing in the CentOS one so I assume that CentOSPlus needs to rebuild the FC5 one again. __________________________________________________ Improve the mailing list by performing a simple search before

I took a lil trip and decided to bring my rhel-converted-to-centos desktop with me. I have a few screenshots at http://s78.photobucket.com/albums/j90/centosdesktop/ In addition to CentOS Base/Extras/Plus, I have kbs and rpmforge repos. As you can see in one screenshot i have yum utils and about 80 protected packages. I've added Open-Office.org 2.0.1, Gnuchess, artwork from Gnome and wine

In the up and coming wiki, don't forget to have an FAQ/Fight against FUD section. Looking at the web in January an upstream vendor employee said some things in his wiki. In Feb/March CentOS was discussed on the Fedora-list/Slashdot. - Common myths about the legality/ethicality of CentOS - CentOS providing value to Open Source as a whole - Projects emanating from CentOS like SMEServer

I may not agree with everything they say, such as ISPConfig (I prefer webmin) but this tutorial offers a "step by step opportunity for newbies". Does this indicate that CentOS is now a "mainstream" distro? (Technically speaking its not CentOS 4.3 but CentOS 4 Update 3 but we are not into semantics). Article on Slash :- http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/06/05/01/1049254.shtml

Hi, We have this line in micromips-16-bit-instructions.s # CHECK-EB: addu16 $6, $17, $4 # encoding: [0x07,0x42] However, when I check this with llvm-mc, like below, I dont get back the assembly. This is against the latest LLVM code. What is wrong here? Thanks, Jun $ echo "0x07,0x42"|./Release+Asserts/bin/llvm-mc -disassemble -triple=mips -show-encoding -mattr=micromips

For those who have the 3.0.21b or 3.0.21c, Samba 3.0.22 was released as a security update (about a week ago). (I just saw someone on the centos list with 3.0.21c so i thought I'd post this announcement for all others.) The downside to getting non-distro updates from upstream is that you are responsible for watching out for security releases. For those with the CentOS version