search for: standrd

...lumns. I am using these datasets to perform a simulation of of haplotype coalescence over a pedigree (the datestes themselves are pedigree information). I created a new dataset (same number of rows as the pedigree dataset, 2 colums) and I use a looping functions to assign haplotypes according to a standrd biological reprodictive process (i.e. meiosis, sexual reproduction). My code is someting like: off = function(sire, dam){ # simulation of reproduction, two inds sch.toll = round(runif(1, min = 1, max = 2)) dch.toll = round(runif(1, min = 1, max = 2)) s.gam = sire[,sch.toll] d.gam = dam[...

On 21/08/17 10:37, Gedalya wrote: > On 08/21/2017 07:28 AM, voytek at sbt.net.au wrote: >> is there a 'preferred way'? should I tell users to use 143 over 993 ? or >> 993 over 143? or? > There is no concrete answer. There are various opinions and feelings about this. > The opinion againt 993/995 is that these are not standard ports, Out of curiosity, is there a

Dear All, How to use SQL code in R? Thanks! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

What I am doing : create a simple correlation matrix on 41 variables, then plot an heatmap with this program : library(gplots) mat<-cor(temp.alln,use="pairwise.complete.obs") hm<-heatmap.2(mat,symm=T) HM<-format(round(mat[hm[[1]],hm[[2]]],2)) library(RColorBrewer) brewer.pal(10,"Spectral")->mp heatmap.2(mat, symm = TRUE, col = mp,

...d to retain > the validity of the Rsquared ) But, now that I see your email, maybe I > should be still including an intercept and using standard error as the > criteria. > Or maybe when you include an intercept ( in both cases ) you don't get > this asymmetry between Rsquared and standrd error. > I was surprised to see the asymmetry but maybe it happens because one > is comparing model with intercept to a model without intercept and no > intercept probably renders the rsquared critieria meaningless in the > latter. > > Thanks for any insight you can provide. I c...