search for: standby

I think you answered your own question. Samba (smbd) is a service. It is doing its job and ready to offer service at any time. Apparently this involves periodically accessing the disk. There is nothing wrong with this; it is normal operation. Samba won't work anyway when you are in standby, so you might as well stop it when you are done using it. PG > -----Original Message----- > From: matt [mailto:mhull1@uic.edu] > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 1:45 AM > To: samba-technical@lists.samba.org > Subject: standby mode > > > samba 2.3.3a > redhat 7.3 &g...

This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net device to act as a standby for another device with the same MAC address. I tested this with a small change to the patch to mark the STANDBY feature 'true' by default as i am using libvirt to start the VMs. Is there a way to pass the newly added feature bit 'standby' to qemu via libvirt XML file? Signed-off-...

This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net device to act as a standby for another device with the same MAC address. I tested this with a small change to the patch to mark the STANDBY feature 'true' by default as i am using libvirt to start the VMs. Is there a way to pass the newly added feature bit 'standby' to qemu via libvirt XML file? Signed-off-...

We got a remote Oracle 10g R2 standby running on OCFS2. Initial when we started the standby, read I/O was < 5MB/sec on average. Since then it has grown to over 40MB/sec (longer average, it peaks much higher). Here is a graph showing this: http://www.alameda.net/~ulf/dbphx01.png We also have a local standby running (on EXT3) which...

I have a scenario whereby two servers are acting in active-standby mode. In case the active server fail, the shared IP is activated on standby server for continuity. However, SIP phones (all are Polycom) takes quite a long time to register to the Standby Server (up to 1-10min). While Polycom allow double registration, we would like to make it simple by provision...

On 2018?06?12? 01:26, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:09:54PM -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote: >> This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net device to >> act as a standby for another device with the same MAC address. >> >> I tested this with a small change to the patch to mark the STANDBY feature 'true' >> by default as i am using libvirt to start the VMs. >> Is there a way to pass the newly added feature bit 'standby' to qemu...

On 2018?06?12? 01:26, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:09:54PM -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote: >> This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net device to >> act as a standby for another device with the same MAC address. >> >> I tested this with a small change to the patch to mark the STANDBY feature 'true' >> by default as i am using libvirt to start the VMs. >> Is there a way to pass the newly added feature bit 'standby' to qemu...

I don't think this is sufficient. If both primary and standby devices are present, a legacy guest without support for the feature might see two devices with same mac and get confused. I think that we should only make primary visible after guest acked the backup feature bit. And on reset or when backup is cleared in some other way, unplug the primary. Somet...

I don't think this is sufficient. If both primary and standby devices are present, a legacy guest without support for the feature might see two devices with same mac and get confused. I think that we should only make primary visible after guest acked the backup feature bit. And on reset or when backup is cleared in some other way, unplug the primary. Somet...

...g wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On 2018?06?05? 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> > > > > > I don't think this is sufficient. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > If both primary and standby devices are present, a > >> > > > > > legacy guest without > >> > > > > > support for the feature might see two devices with same mac and get > >> > > > > > confused. > >> > > > > > > >> > &g...

...ow that the kernel patches are accepted into > davem's net-next tree. > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/920005/ > > > On 5/7/2018 4:09 PM, Sridhar Samudrala wrote: >> This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net >> device to >> act as a standby for another device with the same MAC address. >> >> I tested this with a small change to the patch to mark the STANDBY >> feature 'true' >> by default as i am using libvirt to start the VMs. >> Is there a way to pass the newly added feature bit 'standby...

...ow that the kernel patches are accepted into > davem's net-next tree. > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/920005/ > > > On 5/7/2018 4:09 PM, Sridhar Samudrala wrote: >> This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net >> device to >> act as a standby for another device with the same MAC address. >> >> I tested this with a small change to the patch to mark the STANDBY >> feature 'true' >> by default as i am using libvirt to start the VMs. >> Is there a way to pass the newly added feature bit 'standby...

Hi, We currently use rsync to create an Oracle standby on a target box from an existing standby by copying all the datafiles while the source standby is in recovery status. We are occasionally running into datafile corruptions being reported by oracle when it is recovering the new standby. Oracle support says they don't recommend copying files whil...

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 12:43:26PM -0700, Siwei Liu wrote: > > The semantics are that the primary is always used if present in > > preference to standby. > OK. If this is the only semantics of what "standby" refers to in > general, that is fine. > > I just don't want to limit the failover/standby semantics to the > device model specifics, the "accelerated datapath" thing or whatever. > I really don't k...

...9:54:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> On 2018?06?12? 01:26, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:09:54PM -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote: >>>> This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net device to >>>> act as a standby for another device with the same MAC address. >>>> >>>> I tested this with a small change to the patch to mark the STANDBY feature 'true' >>>> by default as i am using libvirt to start the VMs. >>>> Is there a way to pass the newly added featu...

...9:54:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> On 2018?06?12? 01:26, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:09:54PM -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote: >>>> This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net device to >>>> act as a standby for another device with the same MAC address. >>>> >>>> I tested this with a small change to the patch to mark the STANDBY feature 'true' >>>> by default as i am using libvirt to start the VMs. >>>> Is there a way to pass the newly added featu...

...Jun 06, 2018 at 10:29:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 2018?06?05? 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > I don't think this is sufficient. > > > > > > > > > > > > If both primary and standby devices are present, a > > > > > > legacy guest without > > > > > > support for the feature might see two devices with same mac and get > > > > > > confused. > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that we should onl...

since I got the big bolus of updates from the CR repo a few days ago my netbook (AcerAspire One D255E) will no longer go to standby when the lid is closed. This was a Gnome desktopp installation with theh MATE desktop fromm EPEL. I've verified that the correct setting still exists in power manager but it persists in continuing to run when the lid closes. it WILL go to standby if explicitly told to do so from the shutdown...

Thank you very much. I can confirm that the TAP-WIN32 driver behaves differently. The quick tests so far revealed that it either reconnected after Standby and Hibernation. I think that at some point I started using the OpenVPN drivers when I had either had trouble with unsigned drivers or the network detection and then just stayed with it. Thanks for pointing out my self-made problem. On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Etienne Dechamps <etienne...

On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:29:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2018?06?05? 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > I don't think this is sufficient. > > > > If both primary and standby devices are present, a legacy guest without > > support for the feature might see two devices with same mac and get > > confused. > > > > I think that we should only make primary visible after guest acked the > > backup feature bit. > > I think we want exactly...