Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "standardoutisdisplay".
Did you mean:
standardoutisdisplayed
2013 Jan 11
1
[LLVMdev] FileCheck + Ninja coloured output
On further thought, I assume this issue actually hits everyone - it's
not just Ninja getting in the way, but lit as well. (which also means
we'd probably need to fix both Ninja and lit to resolve this issue -
but everyone should at least be a little invested in fixing lit).
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote:
> Nope. An easy solution (both
2007 Jul 05
2
[LLVMdev] PATCH (rest of code changes) "bytecode" --> "bitcode"
Here is the bulk of the sanitizing.
My residual doubts center around the question
whether we still do/want to support (un)compressed *byte*code
in 2.0/2.1.
I need a definitive word on this to proceed.
My understanding is that bytecode is already gone, but there are
still some functions/enums that really deal with *byte*code
(instead of *bit*code).
I did not touch those areas, so the attached