search for: stance

Hello, I have succesfully installed puppet on ubunu, one master and one client. I am going through the documentation and I am having a hard time getting this example to work http://docs.puppetlabs.com/learning/manifests.html $ puppet apply my_test_manifest.pp I get this error root@puppet:/etc/puppet/manifests# pwd /etc/puppet/manifests root@puppet:/etc/puppet/manifests# puppet apply

On 13-06-24 2:55 PM, RJ Ryan wrote: > Respectfully, please change your stance on this issue! libshout was developed and is maintained by the Xiph.Org Foundation, whose charter is the development and promotion of media technology that is open and free for anyone to use. As such it's inappropriate for that project to support non-free formats like AAC, no matter how popula...

On Mon, 4 Jan 2016, Peter Stuge wrote: > Hi Kaleb, > > Kaleb Himes wrote: > > OpenSSH port Location: https://github.com/kaleb-himes/openssh-portable.git > > I'm afraid this repository is too messy to be useful. :\ > > You need to use the features offered by git to preserve commit ids if > anyone else besides yourself is going to be able to work with this, >

...bproject of the LLVM project, but as a product, LLD itself is not LLVM nor Clang, so some technical decisions that make sense to them are not directly be applicable or even inappropriate. As a person who spent almost two years on the old LLD and 1.5 years on the new LLD, I can say that Rafael's stance on focusing on making a good linker first really makes sense. I can easily imagine that if we didn't focus on that, we couldn't make this much progress over the past 1.5 year and would be stagnated at a very basic level. Do you know if I'm a person who worked really hard on the old (and...

Hello, I would like to know whether OpenSSH supports x509 certificate based authentication. It looks like OpenSSH has dependency on OpenSSL so does this mean that OpeSSH also supports x509 certificate based authentication. If it does support, can you please point me to the necessary documentation. Thanks Naitik

...risons. In other words, I want to test whether 1A is significantly different than 2A, whether 1B is significantly different than 1B, etc; I am not interested in the comparison of 1A~1B~1C~1D. However, the latter comparisons are what the coefficients seem to give me when I summarize my model. For instance, the coefficient for the interaction term "FirstFactor2:SecondFactorB" doesn't tell me how different 2B is from 1B, it tells me how different 2B is from 2A. Is there a straightforward way to code the contrasts so that the coefficients I get for the interaction terms do the comparison...

...his repository makes CentOS > different from upstream. You should understand the implications > of this prior to enabling CentOSPlus". Essentially this is a > reminder that the CentOS community has no appetite for supporting > slightly non-standard configurations (a very reasonable stance). > > If you need the extra hardware driver modules available with > Plus this shouldn't stop you from running a Plus kernel. > Just be prepared to reproduce any problems using a stock > kernel (which you can still select at boot) if you need to > resolve an OS issue with help...

...AMINI via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > As another data point, the MLIR part of the codebase is pretty consistent on this: never use braces for trivial (single statement) if/else/for, but always put it on every branch if needed on any side of the if/else. Any opinion/stance policy/practice on the "one line, or one statement (& possibly comments, etc)" issue? > We also have clang-format pretty heavily enforced (including in the automated pre-merge testing on phabricator) which does not lead to issues where someone would add something into the body of...

...Similarly, these need to go through a union to avoid TBAA problems. These are just wrong: they'll hash +0 and -0 to different values even though they compare ==. > >  void add(StringRef StrVal) { >     addImpl(StrVal.data(), StrVal.size()); >   } > > I'm contradicting my stance above about not caring about the implementation > :), but is MurmurHash a good hash for string data?  The Bernstein hash > function works really well and is much cheaper to compute than Murmur. Have you seen benchmarks saying that, or are you just guessing from the length of the code? The be...

How would I go, If I wanted ACL processing to start with %{auth_user} instead of %{user} when determining rights? -- peter

...w, they are somewhat equivocal in saying it shouldn't be used. [No source given, but it's something I've looked at in the last year and there are places they say "DON'T" and other where it's *far* less emphatic, almost permissive.] I'm not going to take a personal stance - other than to say that using .local is probably going to get more complicated as time goes on, and might be the source of some grief. Unfortunately, AFAICT, there's no real great alternative to a non-internet first level domain that one can be sure will never exist in the real world.

Hi team, In Samba 3.6, rpc_server/spoolss/srv_spoolss_nt.c file has this stance at line 1740: /* some sanity check because you can open a printer or a print server */ /* aka: \\server\printer or \\server */ DEBUGADD(3,("checking name: %s\n", r->in.printername)); result = open_printer_hnd(p, r->out.handle, r->in.printername, 0); if (!W_ERROR_IS_O...

Hi We're testing the sssd dynamic dns for AD Linux clients. The w7 clients seem to issue an update request every 20 minutes or so, which seems a bit excessive. The sssd default is 24 hours, which otoh seems a bit mean. Is there an official Samba stance on this? Anyone else using dyndns with Linux boxes? Cheers, Steve

So is the official stance as per edge rails that multiple class definitions must go into separate files? I was trying to use STI with acts_as_attachment, to have all my attachment classes go into a single file, for example: attachment.rb class Attachment < ActiveRecord::Base end class UserPicture < Attachment be...

...itself is >>> not LLVM nor Clang, so some technical decisions that make sense to them are >>> not directly be applicable or even inappropriate. As a person who spent >>> almost two years on the old LLD and 1.5 years on the new LLD, I can say >>> that Rafael's stance on focusing on making a good linker first really makes >>> sense. I can easily imagine that if we didn't focus on that, we couldn't >>> make this much progress over the past 1.5 year and would be stagnated at a >>> very basic level. Do you know if I'm a person...

On 02/01/18 16:33, Ben Lindstrom wrote: > And how many annoying "Do you really want to do this?" type questions > do you prompt the user and assume it is "fine"? I think zero.? I think the warning goes in the man page: ? --allow-insecure-short-key? This option allows use of keys shorter than 1024 bits, however, it is known that such keys can be broken quite

...at makes sure any FC/FE packages are always 100% redistributable by others) B) Red Hat shifted away from the few static links that it has previously used (more likely?) C) The packages causing the linking licensing issues have change their licensing? (NuSphere possibly?) D) MySQL AB changed its stance on linking in MySQL 4 as of v4.1? Anyone know the answer? I have to go back and research why Red Hat stuck with 3.23 and see how they are now redistributing 4.1x? > CentOS-4 has the identical programs {as with all other items except > LOGOS, trademarked text, and yum and where updates are...

...limited to Perl 5.8 features for a few years yet, since the remaining CentOS 5 boxes I?m supporting can?t be upgraded and won?t likely be turned off until they fall over dead. That makes Perl 5.10 ?the future? from my perspective. Living in the past seldwhen is a good idea. > If this sort of stance seems risible to you, you probably shouldn?t be using CentOS. This is what distinguishes a ?stable? type of OS from a ?bleeding edge? one. When a version of a software has been released 20 years ago, that doesn?t mean it?s more stable than a version of that software which is being released today....

Has anybody enabled this repo? I understand that it can really mess up updates and upgrades as the dependencies are rather different.

...bproject of the LLVM project, but as a product, LLD itself is not LLVM nor Clang, so some technical decisions that make sense to them are not directly be applicable or even inappropriate. As a person who spent almost two years on the old LLD and 1.5 years on the new LLD, I can say that Rafael's stance on focusing on making a good linker first really makes sense. I can easily imagine that if we didn't focus on that, we couldn't make this much progress over the past 1.5 year and would be stagnated at a very basic level. Do you know if I'm a person who worked really hard on the old (and...