search for: stampeding

Asterisk is sending a 481 in response to an INVITE for reasons I do not understand. Here is the INVITE: INVITE sip:8009499014 at X.YYY.32.3:5060;transport=udp SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:X.YYY.32.10;lr=on;ftag=247898> To: <sip:8009499014 at X.YYY.32.10 :5060>;tag=ac86f72d2bfe10395b2e62e01c70bf66.0f65 From: "Scott Thompson" <sip:7166359474 at X.YYY.32.10>;tag=247898

...; > > > ..snip.. > > > > Could you help a bit in explaining it in English please? > > After looking at the assembler code I finally figured out how > we can get here. And the 'contended' part threw me off. Somehow > I imagined there are two more more CPUs stampeding here and > trying to update the lock->val. But in reality the other CPUs > are stuck in the arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended spinning on their > local value. Well, the lock as a whole is contended (there's >1 waiters), and the point of MCS style locks it to make sure they're no...

...; > > > ..snip.. > > > > Could you help a bit in explaining it in English please? > > After looking at the assembler code I finally figured out how > we can get here. And the 'contended' part threw me off. Somehow > I imagined there are two more more CPUs stampeding here and > trying to update the lock->val. But in reality the other CPUs > are stuck in the arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended spinning on their > local value. Well, the lock as a whole is contended (there's >1 waiters), and the point of MCS style locks it to make sure they're no...

This thread is the official thread on this site/forum that will updated to show when I compiled a deb, etc.. of WINE So please check this thread after a new WINE version has been released to see if I created a deb file, etc.. and when and where to download it if the hosting site has changed. If you don't see a newer version - please keep checking about at least once a day as it may take me

Hi everyone, Just wanted to tell you a little story. We''ve been enthusiastic puppet users since about a year ago here at the Geographic Institute of the University of Zürich. But we won''t use the zpool type ever again. Its just not worth it. Here''s what happened: . one of our servers lost knowledge about one of its zfs pools . puppet didn''t find the pool

...f (val != tail) > > + new |= val; > ..snip.. > > Could you help a bit in explaining it in English please? After looking at the assembler code I finally figured out how we can get here. And the 'contended' part threw me off. Somehow I imagined there are two more more CPUs stampeding here and trying to update the lock->val. But in reality the other CPUs are stuck in the arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended spinning on their local value. Perhaps you could add this comment. /* Once queue_spin_unlock is called (which _subtracts_ _Q_LOCKED_VAL from the lock->val and still preservi...

...______________________________________________ Stuart Luppescu -=-=- University of Chicago ºÍʸ ¤ÈÃÒÆàÈþ¤ÎÉã(EUC) -=-=- s-luppescu at uchicago.edu http://www.consortium-chicago.org/people/sl/sl.html ICQ #21172047 AIM: psycho7070 Don't stop to stomp ants when the elephants are stampeding. >> Sent on 04-Mar-00 at 14:30:39 with xfmail -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body&qu...

Hi. I need to execute a function from within a GUI. This seems to be no problem but this function takes about 4 minutes to finish, which means the application doesn't react at all, while the function is running. Can I execute a function as a separate Thread, while keeping control(e.g. a reference) of it at the same time? If not, how do this with a class containing this function? thanks,

...imple in some ways, but mean the Make > build > is not nearly as scalable as it could be. In particular, the current > organization means the built is often serialized on something that is not > a > strict dependency. It also makes it much more likely to do things like a > stampeding link of all the tools, even though many tools could have been > built earlier. > > > Specific Goals > -------------- > > * Move both build systems to use explicit library dependencies, in a clean > fashion. The CMake files do this now, but I don't think it has been...

...rent system (relatively) simple in some ways, but mean the Make build is not nearly as scalable as it could be. In particular, the current organization means the built is often serialized on something that is not a strict dependency. It also makes it much more likely to do things like a stampeding link of all the tools, even though many tools could have been built earlier. Specific Goals -------------- * Move both build systems to use explicit library dependencies, in a clean fashion. The CMake files do this now, but I don't think it has been made clear to developers when th...

...current system (relatively) simple in some ways, but mean the Make build is not nearly as scalable as it could be. In particular, the current organization means the built is often serialized on something that is not a strict dependency. It also makes it much more likely to do things like a stampeding link of all the tools, even though many tools could have been built earlier. Specific Goals -------------- * Move both build systems to use explicit library dependencies, in a clean fashion. The CMake files do this now, but I don't think it has been made clear to developers when they...

On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 02:46:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long at hp.com> > > This patch introduces a new generic queue spinlock implementation that > can serve as an alternative to the default ticket spinlock. Compared > with the ticket spinlock, this queue spinlock should be almost as fair > as the ticket spinlock. It has about the same

On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 02:46:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long at hp.com> > > This patch introduces a new generic queue spinlock implementation that > can serve as an alternative to the default ticket spinlock. Compared > with the ticket spinlock, this queue spinlock should be almost as fair > as the ticket spinlock. It has about the same

...atively) simple in some ways, but mean the Make build > is not nearly as scalable as it could be. In particular, the current > organization means the built is often serialized on something that is not a > strict dependency. It also makes it much more likely to do things like a > stampeding link of all the tools, even though many tools could have been > built earlier. > > > Specific Goals > -------------- > > * Move both build systems to use explicit library dependencies, in a clean > fashion. The CMake files do this now, but I don't think it has be...

...simple in some ways, but mean the Make build > is not nearly as scalable as it could be. In particular, the current > organization means the built is often serialized on something that is not a > strict dependency. It also makes it much more likely to do things like a > stampeding link of all the tools, even though many tools could have been > built earlier. > > > Specific Goals > -------------- > > * Move both build systems to use explicit library dependencies, in a clean > fashion. The CMake files do this now, but I don't think it has...

Hello everyone! With the completion of our first few release candidates for 4.2, it''s time to look forward and start planning for the 4.3 release. I''ve volunteered to step up and help coordinate the release for this cycle. The 4.2 release cycle this time has been nearly a year and a half. One of the problems with having such a long release is that people who get in features