Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "stampede".
Did you mean:
stamped
2013 Sep 16
1
asterisk 1.8 sends "SIP/2.0 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist" to INVITE
...042d534.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
X.YYY.33.178:5060;rport=5060;received=X.YYY.33.178;branch=z9hG4bK57b720cccb00f8498662f48e8
Call-ID: 94f80f866e877490729548a079abe371 at 192.168.101.5
CSeq: 2 INVITE
Contact: <sip:7166359474 at X.YYY.33.178:5060>
Max-Forwards: 69
x-inin-crn: 2001471530;loc=Amherst;ms=STAMPEDE-MS
Supported: join, replaces
User-Agent: ININ-TsServer/3.13.11.12748
Allow: ACK, BYE, CANCEL, INFO, INVITE, NOTIFY, OPTIONS, PRACK, REFER,
SUBSCRIBE
Accept: application/sdp
Accept-Encoding: identity
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 252
Proxy-Authorization: Digest
username="9090036...
2014 Jun 23
1
[PATCH 01/11] qspinlock: A simple generic 4-byte queue spinlock
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:03:29PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > + new = tail | (val & _Q_LOCKED_MASK);
> > > +
> > > + old = atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, val, new);
> > > + if (old == val)
> > > + break;
> > > +
> > > + val = old;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + *
2014 Jun 23
1
[PATCH 01/11] qspinlock: A simple generic 4-byte queue spinlock
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:03:29PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > + new = tail | (val & _Q_LOCKED_MASK);
> > > +
> > > + old = atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, val, new);
> > > + if (old == val)
> > > + break;
> > > +
> > > + val = old;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + *
2008 Jun 19
1
Official Nowshining WINE UPDATE THREAD (June 18 2008)
...don't guarantee anything.
Q: I installed alien how do I do the conversion?
A: Use sudo if you can and do the following in the temrinal/CLI depending on your distro.
...........................................
RPM:
sudo alien -r pathtofile/file
............................................
Stampede slp package:
sudo alien --to-slp pathtofile/file
...........................................
LSB package:
sudo alien -l pathtofile/file..
..............................................
Slackware Tgz package:
sudo alien -t pathtofile/file
................................................
-...
2010 Apr 06
15
Why we wont use zpool ever again
Hi everyone,
Just wanted to tell you a little story. We''ve been enthusiastic puppet
users since about a year ago here at the Geographic Institute of the
University of Zürich.
But we won''t use the zpool type ever again. Its just not worth it.
Here''s what happened:
. one of our servers lost knowledge about one of its zfs pools
. puppet didn''t find the pool
2014 Jun 17
0
[PATCH 01/11] qspinlock: A simple generic 4-byte queue spinlock
> > + new = tail | (val & _Q_LOCKED_MASK);
> > +
> > + old = atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, val, new);
> > + if (old == val)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + val = old;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * we won the trylock; forget about queueing.
> > + */
> > + if (new == _Q_LOCKED_VAL)
> > + goto release;
2000 Mar 04
1
Need Arith.h
I just installed 1.0 (great job, everyone!) and rebuilt all my packages. I have
found an error in making VR_6.1-6.tar.gz:
Installing package `MASS' ...
libs
gcc -I/usr/lib/R/include -mieee-fp -fPIC -O2 -m486 -fno-strength-reduce -g
-c MASS.c -o MASS.o
MASS.c:631: Arith.h: No such file or directory
make: *** [MASS.o] Error 1
The file /usr/lib/R/include/Arith.h used to be there (locate
2003 Jan 11
3
Multithreading
Hi.
I need to execute a function from within a GUI.
This seems to be no problem but this function takes about 4 minutes to
finish, which means the application doesn't react at all, while the
function is running.
Can I execute a function as a separate Thread, while keeping
control(e.g. a reference) of it at the same time?
If not, how do this with a class containing this function?
thanks,
2011 Oct 28
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
I have a very high level comment, and you may be able to directly shed light
on it before I dig into a lot more detail.
Why not simply standardize on CMake? It's not my favorite tool, but it seems
to work well, we have established usage of it, and several people involved
in the project who understand how it works. It doesn't seem like a
significantly more burdensome dependency than Python
2011 Oct 28
19
[LLVMdev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
Hi all,
As you might have inferred, I'm in the process of working on some changes to the
way LLVM builds. I have outlined a rough proposal below, unless there are any
major objections I will probably start committing stuff next week.
This message may be verbose, if you want the executive summary, skip
to 'What This
Means For Jane "LLVM Developer" Doe' at the bottom.
2011 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
+1
We build our OpenCL SDK (for windows and Linux) using CMake. We’ve integrated LLVM’s Cmake hierarchy into our own (customizing LLVM external parameters like build and install directories, added passes, etc)
Migrating LLVM’s build system from CMake to something else would require us to change the way we currently do things.
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at
2014 Jun 16
4
[PATCH 01/11] qspinlock: A simple generic 4-byte queue spinlock
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 02:46:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long at hp.com>
>
> This patch introduces a new generic queue spinlock implementation that
> can serve as an alternative to the default ticket spinlock. Compared
> with the ticket spinlock, this queue spinlock should be almost as fair
> as the ticket spinlock. It has about the same
2014 Jun 16
4
[PATCH 01/11] qspinlock: A simple generic 4-byte queue spinlock
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 02:46:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long at hp.com>
>
> This patch introduces a new generic queue spinlock implementation that
> can serve as an alternative to the default ticket spinlock. Compared
> with the ticket spinlock, this queue spinlock should be almost as fair
> as the ticket spinlock. It has about the same
2011 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
On Oct 27, 2011, at 6:34 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> I have a very high level comment, and you may be able to directly shed light on it before I dig into a lot more detail.
>
> Why not simply standardize on CMake? It's not my favorite tool, but it seems to work well, we have established usage of it, and several people involved in the project who understand how it works. It
2011 Nov 01
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
Daniel,
I'm just a 42 year old former NeXT and Apple Dev who back in Mechanical
Engineering is excited about OpenCL/OpenGL and all that is with
LLVM/Clang, but I've got to say that even though my plans include
learning Python for various areas of development the last I want to deal
with is a Build system needing it to compile a Compiler Suite.
Autotools is a bag of hurt, always has
2012 Aug 20
22
Xen 4.3 release planning proposal
Hello everyone! With the completion of our first few release candidates
for 4.2, it''s time to look forward and start planning for the 4.3
release. I''ve volunteered to step up and help coordinate the release
for this cycle.
The 4.2 release cycle this time has been nearly a year and a half.
One of the problems with having such a long release is that people who
get in features