search for: stage3

FYI, I just successfully performed a 3-stage bootstrap with stage2/stage3 object file comparison on x86_64-apple-darwin16 for llvm/clang/clang-tools-extra/compiler-rt/libcxx/openmp/polly using our custom fink packaging scripts with the -DLLVM_REVERSE_ITERATION:BOOL=ON cmake option. There were no stage2/stage3 object file comparison failures or test suite regressions....

...n, Jul 9, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Jack Howarth via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> FYI, I just successfully performed a 3-stage bootstrap with >> stage2/stage3 object file comparison on x86_64-apple-darwin16 for >> llvm/clang/clang-tools-extra/compiler-rt/libcxx/openmp/polly using our >> custom fink packaging scripts with the >> -DLLVM_REVERSE_ITERATION:BOOL=ON cmake option. There were no >> stage2/stage3 object file comparison fai...

Do any of the current build bots for llvm.org perform 3-stage bootstraps with file comparison of the stage2 and stage3 object files and generated headers? On x86_64-apple-darwin16 using the fink projects llvm packaging methodology (crafted by David Fang), I am seeing non-deterministic file comparison failures in current trunk that goes back as far as r296837. http://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32342 The non-det...

...Stage 1: build clang with gcc > > Stage 2: build clang with the clang created by gcc > > Stage 3: build clang with the clang created by clang. > > Final test: compare the object files geneated on Stage 2 with the object > files generated on Stage 3. > This is the first time stage3 has been built, I am happy (up until now, stage3 was failing at the first compilation): [elcuco at pinky ~/src/llvm] ls -l bootstrap-stage-*/bin/clang -rwxrwxr-x. 1 elcuco elcuco 23594232 2010-05-06 22:56 bootstrap-stage-1/bin/clang -rwxrwxr-x. 1 elcuco elcuco 24391566 2010-05-06 23:10 bootstrap-s...

...gt; http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-with-thin-lto-ubuntu/builds/9803 >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-with-lto-ubuntu/builds/8173 >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-freebsd/builds/18082 > Note what *specifically* failed: > * compare-compilers compare stage3 and stage4 compilers failed ( 0 secs ) > * compare-tablegen-inc-files compare stage3 and stage4 Tablegen inc > files failed ( 1 secs ) > > I.e. it wasn't tests that failed. Failing that tests means the compiler doesn't produce deterministic output because the stage3 and stage...

...lvm.org:8011/builders/clang-with-thin-lto-ubuntu/builds/9803 >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-with-lto-ubuntu/builds/8173 >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-freebsd/builds/18082 >> Note what *specifically* failed: >> * compare-compilers compare stage3 and stage4 compilers failed ( 0 secs ) >> * compare-tablegen-inc-files compare stage3 and stage4 Tablegen inc >> files failed ( 1 secs ) >> >> I.e. it wasn't tests that failed. > > Failing that tests means the compiler doesn't produce deterministic output bec...

...>> > > Yes. I use my system g++ for my stage1, I use that compiler to build my > stage2, and I use my stage2 bootstrapped compiler for all my development > work. I rebuild my stage2 every few months. > > I don't think I've ever explicitly checked that I get stage2 == stage3, > but stage2 produces working compilers, but I'm doing a full bootstap now > and I'll let you know when it's done. > Just for fun, I used libc++ and libc++abi instead of libc++ and libstdc++. Bootstrap success, with: $ ldd ./bin/clang linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007f...

...the failed ones: > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-with-thin-lto-ubuntu/builds/9803 > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-with-lto-ubuntu/builds/8173 > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-freebsd/builds/18082 Note what *specifically* failed: * compare-compilers compare stage3 and stage4 compilers failed ( 0 secs ) * compare-tablegen-inc-files compare stage3 and stage4 Tablegen inc files failed ( 1 secs ) I.e. it wasn't tests that failed. > I reverted the change (r330180), but now I’m stuck with how to proceed with > it, as I can’t reproduce any of these. &gt...

...r less simple than the title suggests, please read carefully, thanks. I have 2 sets of data, both read into R >data1<-read.table ("1.txt", header=T, sep="\t") >data2<-read.table ("2.txt", header=T, sep="\t") >data1 Taxon stage1 stage2 stage3 stage4 T1 0 0 1 1 T2 0 1 1 0 T3 0 0 0 1 T4 1 0 0 0 >data2 # this is a library file, it contains all possible values of stage (Col_1) that may be con...

Hi, Recently I committed a change (r330175) that passed all my testing, but failed on several bots. Namely, these are the failed ones: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-with-thin-lto-ubuntu/builds/9803 <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-with-thin-lto-ubuntu/builds/9803> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-with-lto-ubuntu/builds/8173

..." \ -A "$(product_name)"\ $DIR/../ The isolinux.cfg file looks like this: default quiet prompt 1 timeout 100 display message.txt label quiet kernel SA.1 append ide=nodma initrd=SA.2 root=/dev/ram/0 init=/linuxrc ramdisk_size=51200 ramdisk_blocksize=4096 Stage3=cdrom:/ DEBUG=0 quiet label debug kernel SA.1 append ide=nodma initrd=SA.2 root=/dev/ram/0 init=/linuxrc ramdisk_size=51200 ramdisk_blocksize=4096 Stage3=cdrom:/ DEBUG=9 label linux kernel SA.1 append ide=nodma initrd=SA.2 root=/dev/ram/0 init=/linuxrc ramdisk_size=51200 ramdi...

...ly, these are the failed ones: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-with-thin-lto-ubuntu/builds/9803 http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-with-lto-ubuntu/builds/8173 http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-freebsd/builds/18082 Note what *specifically* failed: * compare-compilers compare stage3 and stage4 compilers failed ( 0 secs ) * compare-tablegen-inc-files compare stage3 and stage4 Tablegen inc files failed ( 1 secs ) I.e. it wasn't tests that failed. Failing that tests means the compiler doesn't produce deterministic output because the stage3 and stage 4 compiler has to b...

...nge and go with Gentoo for my rails development and test box. I figure the easy of maintenance is worth the setup hassles. Anyway, I''m followin the instructions on the Gentoo web site. I''ve selected the ..''i686'' 2.6 kernel for my 700mhz amd processor, and choosen stage3 install option from CD. I''m now at the the ''USE'' variable section. Don''t know what to specify here. I would like to have Postgress, lighttpd, SCGI, and rails installed when I''m done. Oh, and subversion, if it can work with lighttpd, ( but that can wait)....

Hello guys, On cygwin-1.7, I can build and test clang successfully by 3-stage. Known issues: - binaries among stage2 and stage3 do not match. (other than timestamp and checksum) investigating. - I met some warnings. I have fixes for them. - [llvm] r127241 - [llvm] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20110307/117725.html - [clang] r127283 - [clang] r127308 - It seems generated...

> > Actually its [configure-stage3-intl] where its hanging. This can easily be due to inline FP math in the stdlib headers. For example - I had to maintain slightly hacked mingw32 headers which do not contain inline FP assembler, otherwise at least libstdc++ configure would hang. No idea about cygwin though. --- With best reg...

...atrixes with the different dimension column by column. Let make an example: If I have two matrixes "X" and "Y"as follow: X<- matrix(1:12, nrow=4, ncol=3, dimnames=list(c("A","B","C","D"), c("stage1","stage2","stage3"))) Y<- matrix(1:28, nrow=4, ncol=7, dimnames=list(c("A","B","C","D"), c("site1","site2","site3","site4","site5", "site6","site7"))) I would like to multiply first column of the...

...t; itself multiple levels deep? > Yes. I use my system g++ for my stage1, I use that compiler to build my stage2, and I use my stage2 bootstrapped compiler for all my development work. I rebuild my stage2 every few months. I don't think I've ever explicitly checked that I get stage2 == stage3, but stage2 produces working compilers, but I'm doing a full bootstap now and I'll let you know when it's done. > I believe both ABI alternatives are drop-in replacements and I hope not > the root cause of what we observed. (We are only testing with libcxxrt > though) > --...

On 10/29/13 07:01 AM, Richard Smith wrote: > > [As an aside: I use libc++ for my Clang development (on Ubuntu Linux), > and it works for me (tm). This is with libstdc++ providing the ABI > pieces, rather than libc++abi or libcxxrt, though.] libc++ "works" for us as well, but it can't self host. I don't know if your "works" and my definition of works is

Hello fellow LLVMers and Clangstas, We want to make Clang great, and we need your help! Helping is easy: just build Clang on your platform and start using it as your main compiler for LLVM and Clang development. Much of the Clang team has been living on Clang for at least several weeks already, and we've found it to be quite stable for development. If you run into problems---poor

...r on first bootstrap pass in configure when "checking executable > suffix", presumably this is the first self call. > > On the face of it, it looks like it may be a tough one to debug, dont know > if GCC 3.4.4 Cygwin will make it to 2.5 release. > Actually its [configure-stage3-intl] where its hanging. Aaron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090222/540067b5/attachment.html>