search for: stackglue

...e API ocfs2_dlm_lvb_valid(). It returns non-zero when the LVB is valid. o2dlm will always return valid, while fs/dlm will check VALNOTVALID. Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker at oracle.com> --- fs/ocfs2/stack_o2cb.c | 11 +++++++++++ fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c | 8 ++++++++ fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c | 13 +++++++------ fs/ocfs2/stackglue.h | 6 ++++++ 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/stack_o2cb.c b/fs/ocfs2/stack_o2cb.c index fcd120f..3f66137 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/stack_o2cb.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/stack_o2cb.c @@ -236,6 +236,16 @@ static int o2cb_dlm_...

...| 4 +-- fs/inode.c | 2 +- fs/lockd/svc.c | 6 ++-- fs/nfs/nfs4sysctl.c | 6 ++-- fs/nfs/sysctl.c | 6 ++-- fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c | 2 +- fs/ntfs/sysctl.c | 4 +-- fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c | 8 +++--- fs/quota/dquot.c | 6 ++-- fs/xfs/xfs_sysctl.c | 26 ++++++++--------- include/linux/key.h | 2 +- include/net/ipv6.h | 4 +-- include/net/ndisc.h | 2 +- ipc/ipc_sysctl.c...

...| 2 +- fs/ocfs2/slot_map.c | 454 +++++++++++--- fs/ocfs2/slot_map.h | 32 +- fs/ocfs2/stack_o2cb.c | 420 +++++++++++++ fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c | 883 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c | 568 +++++++++++++++++ fs/ocfs2/stackglue.h | 261 ++++++++ fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 103 +++- fs/ocfs2/suballoc.h | 1 + fs/ocfs2/super.c | 208 ++++--- fs/sysfs/symlink.c...

Couple more bikesheddy things: Is there ever a reason to use a non __builtin_const_p(perms)? Maybe that should be a BUILD_BUG_ON too BUILD_BUG_ON(!builtin_const_p_perms) My brain of little size gets confused by the BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(foo) + vs BUILD_BUG_ON(foo); as it just seems like more text for the same content. Is there any value on the "_ZERO(foo) +" I don't understand?

Couple more bikesheddy things: Is there ever a reason to use a non __builtin_const_p(perms)? Maybe that should be a BUILD_BUG_ON too BUILD_BUG_ON(!builtin_const_p_perms) My brain of little size gets confused by the BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(foo) + vs BUILD_BUG_ON(foo); as it just seems like more text for the same content. Is there any value on the "_ZERO(foo) +" I don't understand?

The only non-fix here is Joel's new configfs convenience macros, but nobody is using them yet, so I think the patch is safe. By the way, these patches (as usual) are all rebased on top of your latest tree. I think that since the vast majority of ocfs2 and configfs patches are self-contained and within a small area of the kernel that this should probably be fine. If you feel otherwise however,

Joe Perches <joe at perches.com> writes: > On Sun, 2014-03-16 at 22:00 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: >> On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 14:25 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: >> >> > Erk, our tests are insufficient. Testbuilding an allmodconfig with this >> > now: >> >> Good idea. >> >> > diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h

Joe Perches <joe at perches.com> writes: > On Sun, 2014-03-16 at 22:00 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: >> On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 14:25 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: >> >> > Erk, our tests are insufficient. Testbuilding an allmodconfig with this >> > now: >> >> Good idea. >> >> > diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h

...c | 6 +- fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 11 ++++ fs/ocfs2/journal.c | 43 +++++++++++----- fs/ocfs2/journal.h | 2 +- fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 15 ++++-- fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h | 10 ++++ fs/ocfs2/stack_o2cb.c | 11 ++++ fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c | 8 +++ fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c | 13 +++-- fs/ocfs2/stackglue.h | 6 ++ fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 28 +++++++++-- fs/ocfs2/super.c | 69 ++++++++++++++------------- fs/ocfs2/sysfile.c | 19 +++++++ include/linux/lockdep.h | 15 ++++++ 17 files changed, 309 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-) -- Li...

Hi, When system booting getting error message "modprobe: FATAL: Module ocfs2_stackglue not found" in message. Some nodes reboot without any error message. ------------------------------------------------- ul 27 10:02:19 alf3 kernel: ip_tables: (C) 2000-2006 Netfilter Core Team Jul 27 10:02:19 alf3 kernel: Netfilter messages via NETLINK v0.30. Jul 27 10:02:19 alf3 kernel: ip_...

...lgaas <bhelgaas at google.com> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com> for drivers/pci/slot.c It looks like fs/ocfs2/cluster/sys.c and fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c also use S_IFREG in a similar way. > diff --git a/drivers/pci/slot.c b/drivers/pci/slot.c > index 7dd62fa9d0bd..396c200b9ddb 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/slot.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/slot.c > @@ -116,11 +116,11 @@ static void pci_slot_release(struct kobject *kobj) > } > > s...

This patch adds jbd_lock_bh_state() and jbd_unlock_bh_state() around accessses to jh->b_committed_data. Fixes oss bugzilla#1131 http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1131 Signed-off-by: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran at oracle.com> --- fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c

The versioning information is confusing for end-users. The numbers are stuck at 1.5.0 when the tools have moved to 1.8.3. I suggest removing the versioning system in the kernel altogether and let the kernel version be the guide to debug issues. However, if you think versioning is still required, please state the reason and modify the version string in the ver.* files to reflect the uptodate

ocfs2 currently uses the Journaled Block Device (JBD) for its journaling. This is a very stable and tested codebase. However, JBD is limited by architecture to 32bit block numbers. This means an ocfs2 filesystem is limited to 2^32 blocks. With a 4K blocksize, that's 16TB. People want larger volumes. Fortunately, there is now JBD2. JBD2 adds 64bit block number support and some other