search for: stack_protector

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "stack_protector".

2020 Apr 01
3
New LLVM backend for Renesas RL78 MCU
...nd then handling that section in the linker script accordingly. And a few more pragmas for we could have equivalent __attribute__. #pragma saddr [(]variable-name[,...][)] #pragma near [(] function-name [,...][)] #pragma far [(] function-name [,...][)] #pragma callt [(]function-name[,...][)] #pragma stack_protector [(]function-name[(num=number)][,function-name[(num=number)]][,...][)] #pragma no_stack_protector [(]function-name[,...][)] Finally there are 2 operators: __sectop("section-name") __secend("section-name") This can be easily done by adding symbols at start and end of output secti...
2020 May 26
2
New LLVM backend for Renesas RL78 MCU
...nd then handling that section in the linker script accordingly. And a few more pragmas for we could have equivalent __attribute__. #pragma saddr [(]variable-name[,...][)] #pragma near [(] function-name [,...][)] #pragma far [(] function-name [,...][)] #pragma callt [(]function-name[,...][)] #pragma stack_protector [(]function-name[(num=number)][,function-name[(num=number)]][,...][)] #pragma no_stack_protector [(]function-name[,...][)] Finally there are 2 operators: __sectop("section-name") __secend("section-name") This can be easily done by adding symbols at start and end of output secti...
2020 May 26
1
New LLVM backend for Renesas RL78 MCU
...nd then handling that section in the linker script accordingly. And a few more pragmas for we could have equivalent __attribute__. #pragma saddr [(]variable-name[,...][)] #pragma near [(] function-name [,...][)] #pragma far [(] function-name [,...][)] #pragma callt [(]function-name[,...][)] #pragma stack_protector [(]function-name[(num=number)][,function-name[(num=number)]][,...][)] #pragma no_stack_protector [(]function-name[,...][)] Finally there are 2 operators: __sectop("section-name") __secend("section-name") This can be easily done by adding symbols at start and end of output secti...
2007 Dec 25
3
ProPolice/SSP in 7.0
Hi there, I'm still running 6.2 on various servers without any tweaks (GENERIC kernel, binary updates via freebsd-update etc.) but lots of ports (apache, postgresql, diablo-jdk etc.) and would like to use stack smashing protection in order to harden my boxes and avoid many potential exploits. I've known about ProPolice/SSP for a while now (from the Gentoo world) and am aware that