search for: stableserv

...e developed in Java. Could be there are more downsides to that plan than upsides. > I don't think the C++ guys have even figured > out a sane way to use a standard boost version on 2 different Linux's, > even doing separate builds for them. This method works for me: # scp -r stableserver:/usr/local/boost-1.x.y /usr/local # cd /usr/local # ln -s boost-1.x.y boost Then build with CXXFLAGS=-I/usr/local/boost/include. >>>> I?ve never done much with Windows Server, but my sense is that they have plenty of churn over in their world, too. >>> >>> Yes...

On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Dec 29, 2014, at 10:07 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > >> it's not necessary for either code interfaces or data structures >> to change in backward-incompatible ways. > > You keep talking about the cost of coping with change, but apparently you believe

...nd the Pentaho tools to the list too - all used here. >> I don't think the C++ guys have even figured >> out a sane way to use a standard boost version on 2 different Linux's, >> even doing separate builds for them. > > This method works for me: > > # scp -r stableserver:/usr/local/boost-1.x.y /usr/local > # cd /usr/local > # ln -s boost-1.x.y boost > > Then build with CXXFLAGS=-I/usr/local/boost/include. I don't think CMake is happy with that since in knows where the stock version should be and will find duplicates, And then you have to wo...

...se here (oXygen) shows similar performance problems. Oh, and somehow both of these apps have managed to stay noticeably slow despite the many iterations of Moore?s Law since The Bubble, when these two packages were first perpetrated. >> This method works for me: >> >> # scp -r stableserver:/usr/local/boost-1.x.y /usr/local >> # cd /usr/local >> # ln -s boost-1.x.y boost >> >> Then build with CXXFLAGS=-I/usr/local/boost/include. > > I don't think CMake is happy with that since in knows where the stock > version should be and will find duplica...