Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "stableapi".
Did you mean:
stable_abi
2015 Jul 20
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Developer Policy for LLVM C API
...unaware for quite awhile.
I think this is the most important point, that we lack testing for it.
IMO, the language doesn’t matter too much. I’m happy with C or C++, but whichever (or both) or those are exposed in a stable way, we need the *users* of those APIs to help test it.
How about we add a StableAPI directory in unittests? Then have a test written in C/C++ for each of the users of it. So a WebKit.c test, Go.c, SomeProject.cpp, etc.
Then adding anything to the stable API must have a corresponding test, and changing the API shows us exactly which test broke, who cares about that test, and who...
2015 Jul 20
5
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Developer Policy for LLVM C API
...> I think this is the most important point, that we lack testing for it.
>
> IMO, the language doesn’t matter too much. I’m happy with C or C++, but whichever (or both) or those are exposed in a stable way, we need the *users* of those APIs to help test it.
>
> How about we add a StableAPI directory in unittests? Then have a test written in C/C++ for each of the users of it. So a WebKit.c test, Go.c, SomeProject.cpp, etc.
>
> Then adding anything to the stable API must have a corresponding test, and changing the API shows us exactly which test broke, who cares about that tes...
2015 Jul 18
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Developer Policy for LLVM C API
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Juergen,
>
> I've actually got another, perhaps more radical, plan. Let's just get rid
> of the C API or move it to another project. This simplifies a lot of the
> plans here where people have too many different ideas of how the C API
> should work.
>
> At this point the