search for: st_rd_sect

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "st_rd_sect".

2011 Oct 08
9
xentop reporting zero written sectors
Just moving a chunk of files from one filesysstem on xvba to another on xvdb, and was monitoring with xentop as it was taking longer than expected. The VBD_RD and VBD_WR counters were both clocking-up as expected, as was the VBD_RSECT counter, but the VBD_WSECT counter was stuck on zero, I toggled on the individual VBD device counters and these showed the same (with the RD and WR counters
2011 Oct 08
9
xentop reporting zero written sectors
Just moving a chunk of files from one filesysstem on xvba to another on xvdb, and was monitoring with xentop as it was taking longer than expected. The VBD_RD and VBD_WR counters were both clocking-up as expected, as was the VBD_RSECT counter, but the VBD_WSECT counter was stuck on zero, I toggled on the individual VBD device counters and these showed the same (with the RD and WR counters
2013 Mar 04
4
[blkback] blkback statistic counters are signed values
...tatistics/wr_sect into an unsigned long long. That value is exposed by blkback, and among other stat counters, it''s a signed integer: drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h struct xen_blkif { ... int st_rd_req; int st_wr_req; int st_oo_req; int st_f_req; int st_ds_req; int st_rd_sect; int st_wr_sect; I don''t think these values should be negative ever, but when they overflow (which happens eventually), they do, and this leads to bad conversion in xentop. I think the best solution would be to change the above mentioned values to unsigned long long as well. Any co...
2011 Sep 09
7
[PATCH] xen-blk[front|back] FUA additions.
I am proposing these two patches for 3.2. They allow the backend to process the REQ_FUA request as well. Previous to these patches it only did REQ_FLUSH. There is also a bug-fix for the logic of how barrier/flushes were handled. The patches are based on a branch which also has ''feature-discard'' patches, so they won''t apply nativly on top of 3.1-rc5. Please review and
2011 Sep 01
9
[PATCH V4 0/3] xen-blkfront/blkback discard support
Dear list, This is the V4 of the trim support for xen-blkfront/blkback, Now we move BLKIF_OP_TRIM to BLKIF_OP_DISCARD, and dropped all "trim" stuffs in the patches, and use "discard" instead. Also we updated the helpers of blkif_x86_{32|64}_request or we will meet problems using a non-native protocol. And this patch has been tested with both SSD and raw file, with SSD we will