Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "st_rd_sect".
2011 Oct 08
9
xentop reporting zero written sectors
Just moving a chunk of files from one filesysstem on xvba to another
on xvdb, and was monitoring with xentop as it was taking longer than
expected.
The VBD_RD and VBD_WR counters were both clocking-up as expected, as
was the VBD_RSECT counter, but the VBD_WSECT counter was stuck on
zero, I toggled on the individual VBD device counters and these showed
the same (with the RD and WR counters
2011 Oct 08
9
xentop reporting zero written sectors
Just moving a chunk of files from one filesysstem on xvba to another
on xvdb, and was monitoring with xentop as it was taking longer than
expected.
The VBD_RD and VBD_WR counters were both clocking-up as expected, as
was the VBD_RSECT counter, but the VBD_WSECT counter was stuck on
zero, I toggled on the individual VBD device counters and these showed
the same (with the RD and WR counters
2013 Mar 04
4
[blkback] blkback statistic counters are signed values
...tatistics/wr_sect into
an unsigned long long. That value is exposed by blkback, and among other
stat counters, it''s a signed integer:
drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h
struct xen_blkif {
...
int st_rd_req;
int st_wr_req;
int st_oo_req;
int st_f_req;
int st_ds_req;
int st_rd_sect;
int st_wr_sect;
I don''t think these values should be negative ever, but when they
overflow (which happens eventually), they do, and this leads to bad
conversion in xentop.
I think the best solution would be to change the above mentioned values
to unsigned long long as well. Any co...
2011 Sep 09
7
[PATCH] xen-blk[front|back] FUA additions.
I am proposing these two patches for 3.2. They allow the backend
to process the REQ_FUA request as well. Previous to these patches
it only did REQ_FLUSH. There is also a bug-fix for the logic
of how barrier/flushes were handled.
The patches are based on a branch which also has ''feature-discard''
patches, so they won''t apply nativly on top of 3.1-rc5.
Please review and
2011 Sep 01
9
[PATCH V4 0/3] xen-blkfront/blkback discard support
Dear list,
This is the V4 of the trim support for xen-blkfront/blkback,
Now we move BLKIF_OP_TRIM to BLKIF_OP_DISCARD, and dropped all
"trim" stuffs in the patches, and use "discard" instead.
Also we updated the helpers of blkif_x86_{32|64}_request or we
will meet problems using a non-native protocol.
And this patch has been tested with both SSD and raw file,
with SSD we will