Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "ssuming".
Did you mean:
assuming
2020 May 10
2
[llvm-mca] Resource consumption of ProcResGroups
...a pair of shuffles uOPs and a single (data-dependent) vector ADD uOP.
> The ADD uOP doesn't execute immediately because it needs to wait for the other two shuffle uOPs. It means that the ALU pipe is still available at relative cycle #0 and it is only consumed starting from relative cycle #1 (ssuming that both shuffles can start execution at relative cycle #0). In practice, the llvm scheduling model only allows us to declare which pipeline resources are consumed, and for how long (in number cycles). So we cannot accurately describe to mca that the delayed consumption of the ALU pipe.
> Now t...
2006 Aug 15
5
Problems getting WEBrick server up and running (new to ruby)
Hello,
I installed ruby and rails on Monday as I have been hearing great things
about both the ruby language and rails framework.
Installation went smoothly but I am having problems launching a WEBrick
server so see what my newly created rails app is doing!
My ruby/ rails installation:
1) Installed ruby directly by compiling the source code.
2) Working on a windows pc, using cygwin to run /
1998 Oct 01
1
inetd and Solaris
...from inetd (no special reason - just how its been done in the
past). Then on one server we got masses of Samba daemons running (up to 40 as
a time trying to run - load average 40+!), giving following complaints:
Sep 28 14:39:06 zeus.brunel.ac.uk smbd[10728]: standard input is not a socket,
a
ssuming -D option
Sep 28 14:39:06 zeus.brunel.ac.uk smbd[10742]: bind failed on port 139
socket_ad
dr=0.0.0.0 (Address already in use)
... the second error message is because inetd has the socket. The problem
went away when I killed & restarted inetd - thus allowing one of the many smbd
to grab th...
2020 May 10
2
[llvm-mca] Resource consumption of ProcResGroups
...les uOPs and a single (data-dependent) vector ADD uOP.
> The ADD uOP doesn't execute immediately because it needs to wait for the
> other two shuffle uOPs. It means that the ALU pipe is still available at
> relative cycle #0 and it is only consumed starting from relative cycle #1
> (ssuming that both shuffles can start execution at relative cycle #0). In
> practice, the llvm scheduling model only allows us to declare which
> pipeline resources are consumed, and for how long (in number cycles). So we
> cannot accurately describe to mca that the delayed consumption of the ALU
&...
2020 May 09
2
[llvm-mca] Resource consumption of ProcResGroups
Hi,
I’m trying to work out the behavior of llvm-mca on instructions with ProcResGroups. My current understanding is:
When an instruction requests a port group (e.g., HWPort015) and all of its atomic sub-resources (e.g., HWPort0,HWPort1,HWPort5), HWPort015 is marked as “reserved” and is issued in parallel with HWPort0, HWPort1, and HWPort5, blocking future instructions from reserving HWPort015