Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "ssplit".
Did you mean:
split
2011 Apr 05
3
[LLVMdev] Incompatible types at call site
Hi,
For a call like this,
%tmp6 = call i32 (...)* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8, i8**)* @ssplit to i32
(...)*)(i8* %tmp599, i32 46, i8** %domainv3) nounwind ; <i32>
does the 2nd argument get zero extended or sign extended?
Thanks,
Arushi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110404/aff...
2011 Apr 05
2
[LLVMdev] Incompatible types at call site
...s used? Does this use decide whether the value is sign extended or
zero extended?
Arushi
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Arushi,
>
> > For a call like this,
> >
> > %tmp6 = call i32 (...)* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8, i8**)* @ssplit to i32
> (...)*)(i8*
> > %tmp599, i32 46, i8** %domainv3) nounwind ; <i32>
> >
> > does the 2nd argument get zero extended or sign extended?
>
> neither since it does not have the zext or sext attribute.
>
> Ciao, Duncan.
> _________________________________...
2011 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] Incompatible types at call site
Hi Arushi,
> For a call like this,
>
> %tmp6 = call i32 (...)* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8, i8**)* @ssplit to i32 (...)*)(i8*
> %tmp599, i32 46, i8** %domainv3) nounwind ; <i32>
>
> does the 2nd argument get zero extended or sign extended?
neither since it does not have the zext or sext attribute.
Ciao, Duncan.
2011 Feb 17
1
missing values in party::ctree
...er of observations: 699
1) Bare.nuclei == {1, 2}; criterion = 1, statistic = 488.294
2)* weights = 448
1) Bare.nuclei == {3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}
3)* weights = 251
> sum(is.na(BreastCancer$Bare.nuclei))
[1] 16
> nodes(ct, 1)[[1]]$psplit
Bare.nuclei == {1, 2}
> nodes(ct, 1)[[1]]$ssplit
list()
Based on below, the answer is node 2, but I don't see it in the object.
> sum(BreastCancer$Bare.nuclei %in% c(1,2,NA))
[1] 448
> sum(BreastCancer$Bare.nuclei %in% c(1,2))
[1] 432
> sum(BreastCancer$Bare.nuclei %in% c(3:10))
[1] 251
Andrew
2011 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] Incompatible types at call site
...>
> Arushi
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr
> <mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> wrote:
>
> Hi Arushi,
>
> > For a call like this,
> >
> > %tmp6 = call i32 (...)* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8, i8**)* @ssplit to i32
> (...)*)(i8*
> > %tmp599, i32 46, i8** %domainv3) nounwind ; <i32>
> >
> > does the 2nd argument get zero extended or sign extended?
>
> neither since it does not have the zext or sext attribute.
>
> Ciao, Duncan.
> __...
2011 Apr 05
2
[LLVMdev] Incompatible types at call site
...gt; On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr
>> <mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Arushi,
>>
>> > For a call like this,
>> >
>> > %tmp6 = call i32 (...)* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8, i8**)* @ssplit to i32
>> (...)*)(i8*
>> > %tmp599, i32 46, i8** %domainv3) nounwind ; <i32>
>> >
>> > does the 2nd argument get zero extended or sign extended?
>>
>> neither since it does not have the zext or sext attribute.
>>
>>...
2011 Apr 06
0
[LLVMdev] Incompatible types at call site
...:35 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr
>>> <mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Arushi,
>>>
>>> > For a call like this,
>>> >
>>> > %tmp6 = call i32 (...)* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8, i8**)* @ssplit to
>>> i32
>>> (...)*)(i8*
>>> > %tmp599, i32 46, i8** %domainv3) nounwind ; <i32>
>>> >
>>> > does the 2nd argument get zero extended or sign extended?
>>>
>>> neither since it does not have the zext or...