search for: ssib

...printing = bsd printcap name = /dev/null disable spoolss = yes log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log log level = 1 idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap config * : range = 3000-7999 idmap config DOMAIN : backend = rid idmap config DOMAIN : range = 10000-999999 idmap config SSIB.ES : backend = rid idmap config SSIB.ES : range = 1000000-9999999 template shell = /bin/bash template homedir = /home/%U server string = Samba2 ; encrypt passwords = yes unix password sync = Yes pam password change = yes obey pam restrictions = yes dos charset = 850...

...> o, Format F, dag outs, dag ins, string asm, list<dag> > pattern> > > : SSI<o, F, outs, ins, asm, pattern>, Requires<HasSSE1>; Actually, I meant to keep the existing class names intact to avoid global changes. So what I'm proposing is actually: class SSIb<bits<8> o, Format F, dag outs, dag ins, string asm, list<dag> pattern> : I<o, F, outs, ins, asm, pattern>, XS; class SSI<bits<8> o, Format F, dag outs, dag ins, string asm, list<dag> pattern> : SSIb<o, F, outs, ins, asm, pattern>, Requ...

...The only difference here is the parameter to Requires. There are >> many more >> examples and this gets worse with AVX. [...] > Actually, I meant to keep the existing class names intact to avoid > global > changes. So what I'm proposing is actually: > > class SSIb<bits<8> o, Format F, dag outs, dag ins, string asm, > list<dag> pattern> : I<o, F, outs, ins, asm, pattern>, XS; > > class SSI<bits<8> o, Format F, dag outs, dag ins, string asm, > list<dag> pattern> > : SSIb<o, F, outs, ins, as...

There is some redundancy at the instruction format level in the x86 .td files. For example, in X86InstrFormats.td: // SSE1 Instruction Templates: // // SSI - SSE1 instructions with XS prefix. class SSI<bits<8> o, Format F, dag outs, dag ins, string asm, list<dag> pattern> : I<o, F, outs, ins, asm, pattern>, XS, Requires<[HasSSE1]>; // SSE3 Instruction

On Tuesday 31 March 2009 13:53, Dan Gohman wrote: > > class SSI<bits<8> o, Format F, dag outs, dag ins, string asm, > > list<dag> pattern> > > > > : SSIb<o, F, outs, ins, asm, pattern>, Requires<HasSSE1>; > > Is this just factoring out the ", XS" part? As presented, it looks like > this change would introduce more redundancy that it would eliminate. It's factoring out XS and the other encoding bits, but the real g...