Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "ssecurity".
Did you mean:
security
2015 Jul 30
4
why no recent bind update for CentOS 6?
...ounce through CR? that doesn?t make any sense at all. Bug fixes, sure? security, no.
>
Of course it makes sense. Those security updates are not released in a
vacuum, and all the things they are built on/against also need to be
released and installed for them to work.
The source code for the ssecurity updates you are talking about are
built against RHEL-6.7, not 6.6 by Red Hat. They don't necessarily work
on 6.6 without the other updates installed. They also will not
necessarily work correctly if built against 6.6 and then used later on
6.7. We don't do this because it is fun. In fac...
2015 Jul 30
0
why no recent bind update for CentOS 6?
..., at 03:37, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote:
>
> Of course it makes sense. Those security updates are not released in a
> vacuum, and all the things they are built on/against also need to be
> released and installed for them to work.
>
> The source code for the ssecurity updates you are talking about are
> built against RHEL-6.7, not 6.6 by Red Hat. They don't necessarily work
> on 6.6 without the other updates installed. They also will not
> necessarily work correctly if built against 6.6 and then used later on
> 6.7. We don't do this becaus...
1999 Sep 24
0
Re: POP secure access?? {result}
Hi All,
First I would like to thank all who gave me pointers on where to look
for the applications. There are also some of you who wanted me to
post my findings. Hence I have decided to post a mini how-to.
I actually ran a sniffer on it, and all messages are encrypted. :)
If there's any prob, just drop me a line.
Rgrds,
Wong.
begin 666 How-To Ssecure pop or imap.txt
[mod: Grrr... I now
2015 Jul 30
1
why no recent bind update for CentOS 6?
>
> On Jul 29, 2015, at 18:20, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 28, 2015, at 18:48, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 07/29/2015 11:51 AM, Noam Bernstein wrote:
>>> Hi CentOS developers - I?ve been happily using CentOS for several
>>> years now, so thanks for all the good work. In the last week,
2015 Jul 30
3
why no recent bind update for CentOS 6?
> On Jul 28, 2015, at 18:48, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote:
>
> On 07/29/2015 11:51 AM, Noam Bernstein wrote:
>> Hi CentOS developers - I?ve been happily using CentOS for several
>> years now, so thanks for all the good work. In the last week,
>> however, I noticed that while the items in RHSA-2015:1443 has shown
>> up as updates (and announced on
2015 Jul 30
0
why no recent bind update for CentOS 6?
...ke any sense at all. Bug fixes, sure? security, no.
>>
>
> Of course it makes sense. Those security updates are not released in a
> vacuum, and all the things they are built on/against also need to be
> released and installed for them to work.
>
> The source code for the ssecurity updates you are talking about are
> built against RHEL-6.7, not 6.6 by Red Hat. They don't necessarily work
> on 6.6 without the other updates installed. They also will not
> necessarily work correctly if built against 6.6 and then used later on
> 6.7. We don't do this becaus...
2006 May 23
0
LDAP Upgrades (both Unix and Samba)
The latest version of this document can be found at
http://pobox.com/~bcwhite/ldap-upgrade.txt
Last Updated: 2006-05-23
I just upgraded our company's network from a system created 6 years ago
(NIS and SMBPASSWD) to an up-to-date one (for 2006, at least) including
a central LDAP server. It was a far from painless experience, so I
thought I'd write up the experience in the