Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "sse_stepfft".
2012 Sep 22
2
[LLVMdev] Heads up! New SROA implementation is going on-by-default today!
...is the latest LNT
run we got by flipping it on and back off:
http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/3963
Most of this is very, very green. There are three somewhat worrisome
regressions in execution time:
1) sse_expandfft -- when I build this, the binaries have no differences
before and after
2) sse_stepfft -- ditto
3) matmul_f64_4x4 -- this one is interesting
The last one represents the only real regressions I expect to see with the
new pass. There is a helpful indicator about what caused it: the compile
time *improved* by 44%!!! This is because the benchmark was tickling the
bad behavior of the old...
2012 Sep 24
1
[LLVMdev] Heads up! New SROA implementation is going on-by-default today!
.../db_default/v4/nts/3963****
>
> ** **
>
> Most of this is very, very green. There are three somewhat worrisome
> regressions in execution time:****
>
> ** **
>
> 1) sse_expandfft -- when I build this, the binaries have no differences
> before and after****
>
> 2) sse_stepfft -- ditto****
>
> 3) matmul_f64_4x4 -- this one is interesting****
>
> ** **
>
> The last one represents the only real regressions I expect to see with the
> new pass. There is a helpful indicator about what caused it: the compile
> time *improved* by 44%!!! This is because t...