search for: sse_expandfft

...ft I'll tackle when there are reports), and the LNT numbers look *really* good. Here is the latest LNT run we got by flipping it on and back off: http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/3963 Most of this is very, very green. There are three somewhat worrisome regressions in execution time: 1) sse_expandfft -- when I build this, the binaries have no differences before and after 2) sse_stepfft -- ditto 3) matmul_f64_4x4 -- this one is interesting The last one represents the only real regressions I expect to see with the new pass. There is a helpful indicator about what caused it: the compile time *imp...

...atest LNT > run we got by flipping it on and back off:**** > > ** ** > > http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/3963**** > > ** ** > > Most of this is very, very green. There are three somewhat worrisome > regressions in execution time:**** > > ** ** > > 1) sse_expandfft -- when I build this, the binaries have no differences > before and after**** > > 2) sse_stepfft -- ditto**** > > 3) matmul_f64_4x4 -- this one is interesting**** > > ** ** > > The last one represents the only real regressions I expect to see with the > new pass. There...

....0474 0.0480 0.0001 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/04-bisect/bisect.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.MultiSource%2FBenchmarks%2FMcCat%2F04-bisect%2Fbisect.compile=on> > 1.24% 0.1206 0.1221 0.0002 > SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse_expandfft.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.SingleSource%2FUnitTests%2FVector%2FSSE%2Fsse_expandfft.compile=on> > 1.24% 0.1046 0.1059 0.0005 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uudecode/uudecode.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/sim...