search for: sscanferror

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "sscanferror".

2013 Jun 09
2
[PATCH 1/1] tests: Fix sscanf test where width = 1 and integer is negative
sscanf can take an integer which specifies the maximum field width. In this test, the field width is 1 and the input is a negative number so the test fails. This patch increases the maximum field width to 2. Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano <mpagano at gentoo.org> --- usr/klibc/tests/sscanf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/usr/klibc/tests/sscanf.c
2013 Aug 20
0
[PATCH 1/1] tests: Fix sscanf test where width = 1 and integer is negative
...> the test fails. > > This patch increases the maximum field width to 2. thanks, but can you post the failure you are seeing? The one I see is related to the double fields that klibc can't probably shouldn't handle, hence maybe those tests should be disabled: ./usr/klibc/tests/sscanfError wrong sscanf double return 0. Error wrong sscanf double return 0. Error wrong sscanf double return 0. -- maks