search for: ss2

dear all, I am stuck on the following problem. Give a string like ss1<- "z:f(5, a=3, b=4, c='1:4', d=2)" or ss2<- "f(5, a=3, b=4, c=\"1:4\", d=2)*z" I would like to remove all entries within parentheses.. Namely, I aim to obtain respectively "z:f()" or "f()*z" I played with sub() and gsub() but without success.. Thank you very much for your time, best, vito -...

...+ schar *buf = (schar *)buf1; + + i = s1 = s2 = 0; + if (len > 32) { + const char mul_t1_buf[16] = {28, 0, 24, 0, 20, 0, 16, 0, 12, 0, 8, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0}; + __m128i mul_t1 = sse_load_si128((__m128i_u*)mul_t1_buf); + __m128i ss1 = _mm_setzero_si128(); + __m128i ss2 = _mm_setzero_si128(); + + for (i = 0; i < (len-32); i+=32) { + // Load ... 2*[int8*16] + __m128i in8_1 = sse_load_si128((__m128i_u*)&buf[i]); + __m128i in8_2 = sse_load_si128((__m128i_u*)&buf[i + 16]); + + // (1*buf[i] + 1*buf[i+1]), (1...

...schar *buf = (schar *)buf1; + + i = s1 = s2 = 0; + if (len > 32) { + const char mul_t1_buf[16] = {28, 0, 24, 0, 20, 0, 16, 0, 12, 0, 8, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0}; + __m128i mul_t1 = sse_load_si128((void const*)mul_t1_buf); + __m128i ss1 = _mm_setzero_si128(); + __m128i ss2 = _mm_setzero_si128(); + + for (i = 0; i < (len-32); i+=32) { + // Load ... 2*[int8*16] + __m128i in8_1 = sse_load_si128((void const*)&buf[i]); + __m128i in8_2 = sse_load_si128((void const*)&buf[i + 16]); + + // (1*buf[i] + 1*buf[i+1]),...

Hello, Try this. ss1 <- "z:f(5, a=3, b=4, c='1:4', d=2)" ss2 <- "f(5, a=3, b=4, c=\"1:4\", d=2)*z" fun <- function(s) sub("(\\().*(\\))", "\\1\\2", s) fun(ss1) #[1] "z:f()" fun(ss2) #[1] "f()*z" Hope this helps, Rui Barradas On 5/21/2018 2:33 PM, Vito M. R. Muggeo wrote: > dear all,...

...uggestion, but I find the purpose to be more clear. It might also be a little more efficient. HTH Ulrik On Mon, 21 May 2018, 15:38 Rui Barradas, <ruipbarradas at sapo.pt> wrote: > Hello, > > Try this. > > > ss1 <- "z:f(5, a=3, b=4, c='1:4', d=2)" > ss2 <- "f(5, a=3, b=4, c=\"1:4\", d=2)*z" > > fun <- function(s) sub("(\\().*(\\))", "\\1\\2", s) > > fun(ss1) > #[1] "z:f()" > > fun(ss2) > #[1] "f()*z" > > > Hope this helps, > > Rui Barradas >...

...gt; + i = s1 = s2 = 0; > + if (len > 32) { > + const char mul_t1_buf[16] = {28, 0, 24, 0, 20, 0, 16, 0, 12, > 0, 8, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0}; > + __m128i mul_t1 = sse_load_si128((void const*)mul_t1_buf); > + __m128i ss1 = _mm_setzero_si128(); > + __m128i ss2 = _mm_setzero_si128(); > + > + for (i = 0; i < (len-32); i+=32) { > + // Load ... 2*[int8*16] > + __m128i in8_1 = sse_load_si128((void const*)&buf[i]); > + __m128i in8_2 = sse_load_si128((void const*)&buf[i + 16]); > + > +...

...bottom (f3) just in case that might be the issue. Essentially I have compiled a large list of data coming from about 30 subjects with 88 trials each and I am trying to get that function to apply to each subject without having to manually attach each subject's data. The entire filename is 'ss2' so when i run >ss2f3=f3(ss2) >ss2f3 everything is fine. However when I try to use the by() function: >by(ss3, sub, f3) #sub=subject header in the data I get the error message: " Error in var(x, na.rm = na.rm) : missing observations in cov/cor " There are no missing observa...

...; >> + if (len > 32) { >> + const char mul_t1_buf[16] = {28, 0, 24, 0, 20, 0, 16, 0, 12, >> 0, 8, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0}; >> + __m128i mul_t1 = sse_load_si128((void const*)mul_t1_buf); >> + __m128i ss1 = _mm_setzero_si128(); >> + __m128i ss2 = _mm_setzero_si128(); >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < (len-32); i+=32) { >> + // Load ... 2*[int8*16] >> + __m128i in8_1 = sse_load_si128((void const*)&buf[i]); >> + __m128i in8_2 = sse_load_si128((void const*)&buf[i + 16])...

...> + i = s1 = s2 = 0; > + if (len > 32) { > + const char mul_t1_buf[16] = {28, 0, 24, 0, 20, 0, 16, 0, 12, > 0, 8, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0}; > + __m128i mul_t1 = sse_load_si128((__m128i_u*)mul_t1_buf); > + __m128i ss1 = _mm_setzero_si128(); > + __m128i ss2 = _mm_setzero_si128(); > + > + for (i = 0; i < (len-32); i+=32) { > + // Load ... 2*[int8*16] > + __m128i in8_1 = sse_load_si128((__m128i_u*)&buf[i]); > + __m128i in8_2 = sse_load_si128((__m128i_u*)&buf[i + 16]); > + > +...

I've got a couple of SPARCstation 2s (about as fast as a fast 486, for most thing) that I'm going to be using for some testing. I realize that these machines are a bit slow, but when connecting via OpenSSH, it's MUCH slower than connecting to my 486-DX 50. The point where it waits is just after "debug: Sent encrypted session key.". The pause is for about 10 seconds, while

What do you base this on? Per https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/x86-Options.html : "For the x86-32 compiler, you must use -march=cpu-type, -msse or -msse2 switches to enable SSE extensions and make this option effective. For the x86-64 compiler, these extensions are enabled by default." That reads to me like we're fine for SSE2. As stated in my comments, SSSE3 support must be

Hello all, We've been using samba version 3.0.4 on RH9 with success for quite a while now for shares on our domain (DOM1). Since this machine will have to be available in the near future in another domain (DOM2) as a webserver, and limited fileserver, another network interface has been added for the NIC. When browsing the shares from a WIN98SE computer in DOM2, we are able to see the

Hi Guys, In stream_decoder.c when assigning lpc restore function, only IA32 processor benefits from SS2 and SSE4.1 optimization. Shouldn't it be the case for x86_64 processor as well ? Thanks, -- Olivier TRISTAN uvi.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20140311/1d49b5c2/attachment.htm

HI, Friends, Now I have 20 polycom?s SS2 phones. Can Asterisk support 20 users conference meeting? And I want to build HD audio conference by using polycom?s 650 ip phone. Can asterisk support G722 HD audio conference? Any friend can help me? Thanks Zhao xiaoqiang 2008-02-21 zhao_x_q -------------- next part -------------- An HTML a...

When I try to select only those rows from the following data frame, called "data", in which X > Y X Y V3 2 2 1 8.062258 3 3 1 2.236068 4 4 1 6.324555 5 5 1 5.000000 6 1 2 8.062258 8 3 2 9.486833 9 4 2 2.236068 10 5 2 5.656854 11 1 3 2.236068 12 2 3 9.486833 14 4 3 8.062258 15 5 3 5.099020 16 1 4 6.324555 17 2 4 2.236068 18 3 4 8.062258 20 5 4 5.385165 21 1 5 5.000000

Hi! I'm trying to run a game System Shock 2 http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?iVersionId=2270 I have a laptop with Celeron M 420 (1600Mhz). SS2 running something about 5-10fps.. opposing for example to DeusEx that runs _very_ smoothly.. I can say it is not less than 50fps or even more(i just don't know how to enable fps counter). Wine version is 0.9.35 Only messages i get from Wine while running SS2 is: preloader: Warning: failed to...

Hello, I was doing a linear regression with the following formula: lm(y~x+0), so it passes through the origin. But when I called the summary of the regression i saw that R squared is abnormally high (it's a lot lower in other programs such as SigmaPlot and MS Excel).The manual explained the cause of the difference (because of the different computing method), but what should I do to get the

...,10,25,25,25,25,50,25,100,50,25,50,100,100,25,100,100), nrow=2) # see what it looks like sample_sizes ssds<-c(4,4.4,5,6,8) nssds<-length(ssds) results<-list() # first loop steps through the sample for(ss in 1:dim(sample_sizes)[2]) { # get the two sample sizes ss1<-sample_sizes[1,ss] ss2<-sample_sizes[2,ss] then step through your SDs: ssd_index<-1 for(ssd in ssds) { # generate the two samples with the SDs sample1<-rnorm(ss1,ssd) sample2<-rnorm(ss2,ssd) # here run your tests, recording the results that you want results[[(ss-1)*nssds+ssd_index]]<-<your...

I have been trying for the past couple of week to get copernic agent professional and system shock 2 to run successfully under wine. But with no success. Every time I install copernic agent and it almost finish installing I get an error message unable to initialize folder. Now as for system shock I just will not start and I have tried reinstalling system shock 2 but that did not help at all. It

...have other problems, however. Going through the tests outlined in the Trouble-Shooting Section of the Samba3-Howto, I can smbmount a testshare and display its content, but when trying to access the files, Samba panics: ---------------------------- 8< ---------------------------- smb: \> get SS2.FieldServiceManual.pdf Receiving SMB: Server stopped responding Call returned zero bytes (EOF) opening remote file \SS2.FieldServiceManual.pdf ---------------------------- 8< ---------------------------- ---------------------------- 8< ---------------------------- [2008/06/02 09:23:00, 0]...