Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ss061214".
Did you mean:
20061214
2007 Jun 02
7
u32 classifier
Hi folks...!!!
I´ve a problem that i did not solve it.
i want to limit the DOWNLOAD to my hosts (upstream traffic for the firewall)
using IMQ,
If i classify by PORT (source or destination) all seems to be fine,
but...BUT...if i want to restrict by IP addresss (internal IP address) i
can´t do it, because my hosts go to Internet toward the firewall using NAT,
so after NAT my IP address in
2011 Feb 22
0
Re: iproute 2010-2011 - tree problem (udp, quid, action police + action mirred)
...fferent versions kernel and iproute)
>
> Work ok:
> tc -V
> tc utility, iproute2-ss070710
> Linux traktor 2.6.23.17-imq #1 SMP Fri Oct 10 00:12:20 CEST 2008 i686 GNU/Linux
>
> Linux rtr-58.core 2.6.17.13 #1 Mon Mar 10 09:48:28 CET 2008 i686 GNU/Linux
> tc utility, iproute2-ss061214
>
> with the new iproute have a problem.
> I will be grateful for any hint or help.
> Thank you for your time.
>
> If the message sent in breach of procedures sorry.
>
>
> Piotr Homa (Poland)
Could you post these to netdev@vger.kernel.org
--
2007 Feb 14
2
HTB policing affects shaping performance? Please, help.
...both download and upload (approx. 350kbit and 550kbit). I tried to replace tc filter with iptables CLASSIFY but with the same result.
What is the correct approach when configuring separate queues with guaranteed rate without affecting each other?
Running 2.6.19-gentoo-r5, iptables-1.3.5, iproute2-ss061214
Thanx in advance.
Slavius.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc