search for: ss041019

Hi, I am currently working on the TC. I have seen some behaviour which seems to be odd. I know someone in the mailing list would have seen this problem or may have some fix for this problem. When I try to include u32 filters with different priority or pref, I could see the filters being set on all the priority''s irrespective of the priority number. See my sample script below and the

...appened to me on any other machine with 1 processor. Current setup on which the problem appeared a few days ago is Linux 2.4.31, iproute2-ss051107, iptables v1.3.2, Debian (probably testing, I''m not maintaining the system). Setup which caused probles ~year ago is Linux 2.4.28, iproute2-ss041019, iptables v1.2.11, Slackware (mostly "current"). Kernels are heavy patched with p-o-m, imq and grsec. Did anyone had similar problems? And what is the difference between sources (.tar.gz): iproute2-date_only iproute2-2.6.X-date iproute2-ssdate ? In current setups I''m using i...

...-A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 0x1 -j LOG --log-prefix "FWMARK1" don''t give me any result!!!! Nothing is logged! My packets are not marked. Why? I am on a DEBIAN Stable with a KERNEL 2.6.14.2 (hand made with make-kpkg) and the default iptables (v1.2.11) and iproute2 (iproute2-ss041019) Does any one have an idea? (or more ;-) )

...1:20 And its not working :( I tried this script with ports 21, 80 insteed of p2p mark… then it is working, I’m thinking that the problem is on marking p2p packets…what is wrong? Linux Debian 2.4.32.v1 #1 SMP Mon Jan 30 00:14:04 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux iptables v1.3.4 ip utility, iproute2-ss041019 IPP2P v0.8.1_rc1 ______________________________________ Vaidas VDXnet sistemų administratorius _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

...Debian based with the following versions installed: rx1000test:~# uname -a Linux rx1000test 2.6.8-16-486-rx #1 Wed Mar 15 15:33:23 UTC 2006 i586 GNU/Linux rx1000test:~# iptables -v iptables v1.2.11: no command specified rx1000test:~# shorewall version 2.2.3 rx1000test:~# ip -V ip utility, iproute2-ss041019 rx1000test:~# ipsec version Linux Openswan U2.2.0/K2.6.8-16-486-rx (native) Openswan is using the Kernel 2.6 native stack NOT klips. Here is my setup, only one spoke for now: 192.168.1.0/28 160.96.97.248 Dynamic 192.168.1.96/28 | 192.168.1.1 |...

...ult root@ubuntu:~# ip route ls table 111 default via 192.168.1.254 dev eth1 root@ubuntu:~# ip route ls table 222 default via 192.168.2.254 dev eth2 root@ubuntu:~# uname -a Linux ubuntu 2.6.15-23-386 #1 PREEMPT Tue May 23 13:49:40 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux root@ubuntu:~# ip -V ip utility, iproute2-ss041019 root@ubuntu:~# ip route get 1.2.3.1 1.2.3.1 via 192.168.2.254 dev eth2 src 192.168.1.1 cache mtu 1500 advmss 1460 hoplimit 64 root@ubuntu:~# ip route get 1.2.3.2 1.2.3.2 via 192.168.2.254 dev eth2 src 192.168.2.1 cache mtu 1500 advmss 1460 hoplimit 64 As you can see, the "ip route ge...

...8956 Kbits/sec The traffic is being shaped proportially as I''d hoped but each class is well in excess of its configured limit. I am getting similar results on two separate units: 1: Debian (testing), Kernel v2.6.16.19, iproute2 ss070313 2: Ubuntu (dapper), Kernel v2.6.23.1, iproute2 ss041019 I''d be very grateful for any information that could help me out. Thanks, Stu (newbie to HTB) _________________________________________________________________ What are you waiting for? Join Lavalife FREE http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Flavalife9%2Eninemsn%2Ecom%2Eau%2Fcli...