search for: srvsvc_netshareenumall

...dates 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.4 This is the server version string: Domain=[XXX] OS=[Windows 7 Professional 7601 Service Pack 1] Server=[Windows 7 Professional 6.1] This is the failing call and error output: cli_rpc_pipe_open_noauth: opened pipe \srvsvc to machine cvision-pc and bound anonymously. srvsvc_NetShareEnumAll: struct srvsvc_NetShareEnumAll in: struct srvsvc_NetShareEnumAll server_unc : * server_unc : 'xxxxxxxxxx' info_ctr : * info_ctr: struct srvsvc_NetShareInfoCtr leve...

...be already connected. read_socket_with_timeout: client 0.0.0.0 read error = A socket must be already connected.. [2017/01/04 16:44:37, 1] librpc/ndr/ndr.c:ndr_push_error(493) ndr_push_error(5): Bad char conversion [2017/01/04 16:44:37, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(2381) api_rpcTNP: srvsvc: SRVSVC_NETSHAREENUMALL failed. [2017/01/04 16:44:49, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(939) [2017/01/04 16:44:49, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr_internal(1676) getpeername failed. Error was A socket must be already connected. read_socket_with_timeout: client 0.0.0.0 read error = A socket must be already con...

...guest -N I see only IPC$ and Disk type of shares. It is as if Samba server is oblivious to the printers section. Is it possible that this Samba server was built without the capacity to use/display shares of type Printer? How would one know? rpc_api_pipe: host localhost returned 1000 bytes. srvsvc_NetShareEnumAll: struct srvsvc_NetShareEnumAll lists all shares but of type Printer. -d 10 output shows this doing parameter load printers = yes doing parameter cups options = raw doing parameter printcap name = /etc/printcap doing parameter printing = cups # cat /etc/printcap # This file was automatically gen...

...#39;t. This occurs when there is an umlaut in the comment line of the share. Is this WAD? here are the debug lines...from Samba 3.3.3, but it's the same error. Thanks, Howard [2009/06/02 08:25:53, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(2353) api_rpcTNP: srvsvc op 0xf - api_rpcTNP: rpc command: SRVSVC_NETSHAREENUMALL [2009/06/02 08:25:53, 6] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(2379) api_rpc_cmds[15].fn == 2001763c [2009/06/02 08:25:53, 5] rpc_server/srv_srvsvc_nt.c:_srvsvc_NetShareEnumAll(1299) _srvsvc_NetShareEnumAll: 1299 [2009/06/02 08:25:53, 5] rpc_server/srv_srvsvc_nt.c:init_srv_share_info_ctr(515) i...

...0x00000002 (2) auth_info : DATA_BLOB length=0 rpc_api_pipe: got frag len of 68 at offset 0: NT_STATUS_OK rpc_api_pipe: host debian returned 68 bytes. check_bind_response: accepted! cli_rpc_pipe_open_noauth: opened pipe srvsvc to machine debian and bound anonymously. srvsvc_NetShareEnumAll: struct srvsvc_NetShareEnumAll in: struct srvsvc_NetShareEnumAll server_unc : * server_unc : 'debian' info_ctr : * info_ctr: struct srvsvc_NetShareInfoCtr level...

...d_socket_with_timeout: client 0.0.0.0 read error = A socket must > be already connected.. [2017/01/04 16:44:37, 1] > librpc/ndr/ndr.c:ndr_push_error(493) ndr_push_error(5): Bad char > conversion [2017/01/04 16:44:37, 0] > rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(2381) api_rpcTNP: srvsvc: > SRVSVC_NETSHAREENUMALL failed. [2017/01/04 16:44:49, 0] > lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(939) [2017/01/04 16:44:49, > 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr_internal(1676) getpeername failed. > Error was A socket must be already connected. > read_socket_with_timeout: client 0.0.0.0 read error = A socket...

...ient 0.0.0.0 read error = A socket must > > be already connected.. [2017/01/04 16:44:37, 1] > > librpc/ndr/ndr.c:ndr_push_error(493) ndr_push_error(5): Bad char > > conversion [2017/01/04 16:44:37, 0] > > rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(2381) api_rpcTNP: srvsvc: > > SRVSVC_NETSHAREENUMALL failed. [2017/01/04 16:44:49, 0] > > lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(939) [2017/01/04 16:44:49, > > 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr_internal(1676) getpeername failed. > > Error was A socket must be already connected. > > read_socket_with_timeout: client 0.0.0.0 re...

...892339, 3] smbd/ipc.c:511(named_pipe) named pipe command on <> name [2013/02/11 18:05:37.892361, 3] smbd/ipc.c:475(api_fd_reply) Got API command 0x26 on pipe "srvsvc" (pnum 1220) [2013/02/11 18:05:37.892396, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:1626(api_rpcTNP) api_rpcTNP: rpc command: SRVSVC_NETSHAREENUMALL [2013/02/11 18:05:37.892532, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:121(free_pipe_context) free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 208 [2013/02/11 18:05:37.894773, 3] smbd/process.c:1662(process_smb) Transaction 13 of length 45 (0 toread) [2013/02/11 18:05:37.894801, 3] smbd/process.c:1467(s...

Hello, I have a question because POSIX ACL with SMB2 max protocol does not work properly.Did you test VFS xattr acls with SMB2 max protocol? Is it working corectly? Best regards/Adrian Berlin --