Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "srvsvc_netsessenum".
Did you mean:
_srvsvc_netsessenum
2018 Sep 11
2
eventlog functionality
so I sent you the dump separately. and i tried a persistent drive mapping to \\DC\netlogon which I figured should create a more permanent session as you described. That worked the same.
On Tuesday, 11 September 2018, 08:21:50 GMT-7, Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
On Tue, 2018-09-11 at 15:14 +0000, ray klassen via samba wrote:
>
> Yes, after
2018 Sep 11
0
eventlog functionality
...> > wireshark dump shows samba replying with WERR_INVALID_LEVEL.
> >
> > if you could shed any light on that, I would appreciate it.
> If you could get the exact details on that, or the capture file if
> not
> confidential, that would be good.
This showed that it uses srvsvc_NetSessEnum level 10, whereas Samba
only supports level 0 and 1. Perhaps have a go at implementing level
10? It looks like just a cut down version of level 1.
source3/rpc_server/srvsvc/rpc_srvsvc_nt.c
The tests could do with some work however, they are at:
source4/torture/rpc/srvsvc.c
but don't actu...
2018 Sep 12
2
eventlog functionality
...> > wireshark dump shows samba replying with WERR_INVALID_LEVEL.
> >
> > if you could shed any light on that, I would appreciate it.
> If you could get the exact details on that, or the capture file if
> not
> confidential, that would be good.
This showed that it uses srvsvc_NetSessEnum level 10, whereas Samba
only supports level 0 and 1. Perhaps have a go at implementing level
10? It looks like just a cut down version of level 1.
source3/rpc_server/srvsvc/rpc_srvsvc_nt.c
The tests could do with some work however, they are at:
source4/torture/rpc/srvsvc.c
but don't actu...