search for: srv1

...tls = no debug_level = -1 ldap_version = 3 scope = subtree user_attrs = uidNumber=uid,gidNumber=gid user_filter = (&(&(objectClass=Person)(sAMAccountName=%u))) pass_attrs = sAMAccountName=user,userPassword=password pass_filter = (&(&(objectClass=Person)(sAMAccountName=%u))) logs: srv1 dovecot: auth: Debug: auth client connected (pid=0) srv1 dovecot: auth: Debug: client in: AUTH#0111#011PLAIN#011service=doveadm#011resp=<hidden> srv1 dovecot: auth: Debug: ldap(john): bind search: base=DC=DOMAIN,DC=LOCAL filter=(&(&(objectClass=Person)(sAMAccountName=john))) srv1 dove...

Hello, I use dovecot replication and the sieve scripts are not replicated. Mail replication is working fine. Log when sieve script (with Rainloop webmail) is created: Oct 12 12:57:57 srv1 dovecot: managesieve-login: Login: user=<hativ at example.com>, method=PLAIN, rip=91.67.174.186, lip=195.201.251.57, mpid=5360, TLS, session=<OXvK9QV4fOBbQ666> Oct 12 12:57:57 srv1 dovecot: managesieve(hativ at example.com)<5360><OXvK9QV4fOBbQ666>: Debug: Loading modules...

...ecot/2018-August/112548.html Cheers, Tony On 2018-10-12 04:26, Pascal wrote: > Hello, > > I use dovecot replication and the sieve scripts are not replicated. > Mail replication is working fine. > > Log when sieve script (with Rainloop webmail) is created: > Oct 12 12:57:57 srv1 dovecot: managesieve-login: Login: > user=<hativ at example.com>, method=PLAIN, rip=91.67.174.186, > lip=195.201.251.57, mpid=5360, TLS, session=<OXvK9QV4fOBbQ666> > Oct 12 12:57:57 srv1 dovecot: > managesieve(hativ at example.com)<5360><OXvK9QV4fOBbQ666>: Debug:...

just had a server hang on me...seems pretty clearly that some process stole all the RAM (clamd?) Jul 30 16:26:04 srv1 kernel: auditd invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x201d2, order=0, oomkilladj=-17 Jul 30 16:26:08 srv1 kernel: [<c0457d36>] out_of_memory+0x72/0x1a4 Jul 30 16:26:08 srv1 kernel: [<c0459161>] __alloc_pages+0x201/0x282 Jul 30 16:26:08 srv1 kernel: [<c045a3bf>] __do_page_cache_readahea...

Hi all, some years ago i configured a `Primary Domain Controller` through Samba and LDAP (slapd) on an Ubuntu machine (13.10) at 192.168.69.203 which should be accessible by the string/name `SRV1`. I must note i did not installed winbind. I've never had any issue and it looks like it's working fine as about 10 Windows machines joined the PDC and Windows users can login against PDC on daily basis. The method i always used to join the domain throgh Windows clients was right clicking...

...M, Denis Cardon <denis.cardon at tranquil-it-systems.fr> wrote: > Hi Peris, > >> some years ago i configured a `Primary Domain Controller` through >> Samba and LDAP (slapd) on an Ubuntu machine (13.10) at 192.168.69.203 >> which should be accessible by the string/name `SRV1`. I must note i >> did not installed winbind. I've never had any issue and it looks like >> it's working fine as about 10 Windows machines joined the PDC and >> Windows users can login against PDC on daily basis. >> >> The method i always used to join the domai...

...e machine was already joined. On 05/20/16 10:29, Pau Peris wrote: > Hi, > > i've tried adding server max protocol = NT1 into /etc/samba/smb.conf > and restarting smbd and nmbd services but it didn't do the trick. > > I feel like Windows clients are not able to resolve SRV1 into the PDC > and so they can't event try to join the domain. > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Pau Peris <pau at webeloping.es> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> thanks a lot for the tips. I already did the first one, importing the >> following into the registry: &...

You should be able to unbind ipv6 for the win 10 machine's network interface. does "nslookup SRV1" work? Also, you may want to try running tcpdump or ethereal or wireshark on our PDC and see what traffic is captres. On 05/20/16 13:24, Pau Peris wrote: > I'm completely lost as i can ping SRV1 without issues but i'm starting > to think that maybe Windows tries to join the...

...240k freed Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 370k I tested this with different OS like Fedora Core 6 and CentOS-5, both stopped at same time. OpenSUSE stopped after scan the network interface. I have no idea why this happens...in the installserver log I found this Oct 19 11:35:45 srv1 dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on XXX.XXX.201.226 to 00:30:48:85:35:32 via eth1 Oct 19 11:35:45 srv1 dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for XXX.XX.201.226 (XXX.XX201.195) from 00:30:48:85:35:32 via eth1 Oct 19 11:35:45 srv1 dhcpd: DHCPACK on XXX.XX.201.226 to 00:30:48:85:35:32 via eth1 Oct 19 11:38:09 srv1 dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on X...

Excuse me for the little flood please, i've just checked it again and now i see SRV1 as master for exedra.cat workgroup, i event can see in the logs Samba name server SRV1 is now a local master browser for workgroup EXEDRA.CAT on subnet 192.168.69.203 So i'll keep digging on how to fix the issue exposed on my first email, tomorrow i'll try to see wether it's an IPV6...

Hi Peris, > some years ago i configured a `Primary Domain Controller` through > Samba and LDAP (slapd) on an Ubuntu machine (13.10) at 192.168.69.203 > which should be accessible by the string/name `SRV1`. I must note i > did not installed winbind. I've never had any issue and it looks like > it's working fine as about 10 Windows machines joined the PDC and > Windows users can login against PDC on daily basis. > > The method i always used to join the domain throgh Windows cli...

Hi, i've tried adding server max protocol = NT1 into /etc/samba/smb.conf and restarting smbd and nmbd services but it didn't do the trick. I feel like Windows clients are not able to resolve SRV1 into the PDC and so they can't event try to join the domain. On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Pau Peris <pau at webeloping.es> wrote: > Hi, > > thanks a lot for the tips. I already did the first one, importing the > following into the registry: > > Windows Registry Edit...

Hi All, i want to make an extension from pbx1 able to tlak to another extension from pbx2 or use pbx2's trunk to dial outside calls. so i edited in both servers accordinally the iax.conf: register => pbx1:pass at 172.16.200.175 <pbx1%3Apass at 172.16.200.175> [pbx2] type=friend host=dynamic trunk=yes sercret=pass context=[default] ; i used the biggest context to avoid confusion as

...n tho I don't use Ipv6, some windows > machines were attempting to resolve names via invalid DNS servers specified > in ipv6 settings. > > > > On 05/20/16 16:06, Pau Peris wrote: > > Excuse me for the little flood please, i've just checked it again and > now i see SRV1 as master for exedra.cat workgroup, i event can see in > the logs Samba name server SRV1 is now a local master browser for > workgroup EXEDRA.CAT on subnet 192.168.69.203 > > So i'll keep digging on how to fix the issue exposed on my first > email, tomorrow i'll try to see...

I'm completely lost as i can ping SRV1 without issues but i'm starting to think that maybe Windows tries to join the domain through IPV6. ping -c6 SRV1 from this Windows 10 machine leads to host not found so i'm working on this direction right now. Any help will be really appreciated On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Gaiseric V...

...fficeJetK850 Printer HP Officejet Pro K850 HPDesignJet500 Printer HPDesignJet500 RICOH Printer RICOH Aficio MP C2500 Domain=[EXEDRA.CAT] OS=[Windows 6.1] Server=[Samba 4.3.9-Ubuntu] Server Comment --------- ------- SRV1 exedra.cat Workgroup Master --------- ------- EXEDRA.CAT On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Gaiseric Vandal <gaiseric.vandal at gmail.com> wrote: > You should be able to unbind ipv6 for the win 10 machine's network > inte...

...an issue this week where, even tho I don't use Ipv6, some windows machines were attempting to resolve names via invalid DNS servers specified in ipv6 settings. On 05/20/16 16:06, Pau Peris wrote: > Excuse me for the little flood please, i've just checked it again and > now i see SRV1 as master for exedra.cat workgroup, i event can see in > the logs Samba name server SRV1 is now a local master browser for > workgroup EXEDRA.CAT on subnet 192.168.69.203 > > So i'll keep digging on how to fix the issue exposed on my first > email, tomorrow i'll try to see...

Hello there I've got two samba servers srv1 and srv2 smb.conf for srv1: netbios aliases srv1-alias smb.conf for srv2: netbios aliases srv2-alias DNS is configured all right and resolves the names. Each name has got its own IP address. Both servers are AD members, run as expected and can be connected to via their netbios and netbios ali...

...nt how to deal with this error? Can I give any more information? Thank you very much in advance! Regards Philipp [1] https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9853 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10386 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10225 (1) Syslog: > Feb 3 08:52:17 srv1 smbd[12385]: [2014/02/03 08:52:17.292097, 0] ../source3/smbd/open.c:1582(defer_open_done) > Feb 3 08:52:17 srv1 smbd[12385]: PANIC: assert failed at ../source3/smbd/open.c(1582): ret > Feb 3 08:52:17 srv1 smbd[12385]: [2014/02/03 08:52:17.292219, 0] ../source3/lib/util.c:785(smb_panic_s...

...ain but only when in dovecot.conf exsist this option: login_process_per_connection = yes. When "login_process_per_connection = no" , always got "invalid I/O fd 8, callback 0x8064d30" error. from log file ( in dovecot.conf login_process_per_connection = yes): ... Jun 2 08:34:31 srv1 dovecot: auth(default): sql(ramas,192.168.0.3): Password query failed: Jun 2 08:34:31 srv1 dovecot: auth(default): invalid I/O fd 8, callback 0x8064d30 Jun 2 08:34:31 srv1 dovecot: auth(default): sql(ramas,192.168.0.3): Password query failed: Jun 2 08:34:31 srv1 dovecot: auth(default): file auth...