search for: srv03

Hi. I need more space on my domU server, so i create a file image to attach it to the domU. But when i load that image in the domU, show a size very different to the create. I create the file with this command dd if=/dev/zero of=/xen/domains/SRV03/opt-disk.img bs=1024k seek=30720 count=30720 (The idea is create an image disk with 30GB, but when i check the disk on the domU show 64GB.) attach the image to the domU xm block-attach SRV03 tap:aio:/xen/domains/SRV03/opt-disk.img sdb1 w so i access to domU and create the filesystem. mkfs.ext...

I wrote a message a couple of days ago asking about Samba and SMB protocol levels on an old industrial robot with a pre-2010 Samba. That was resolved successfully. I now have another question concerning the same systems (the robots and the new Samba server, HP-SRV03). root at hp-srv03:/ *smbclient -L localhost -U administrator* Enter HPLTS\administrator's password: Sharename Type Comment --------- ---- ------- bock Disk IPC$ IPC IPC Service (Samba 4.13.13-Debian) Reconnecting with SMB1 for workgroup listi...

...g> wrote: > I wrote a message a couple of days ago asking about Samba and SMB > protocol levels on an old industrial robot with a pre-2010 Samba. > That was resolved successfully. I now have another question > concerning the same systems (the robots and the new Samba server, > HP-SRV03). > > root at hp-srv03:/ > *smbclient -L localhost -U administrator* > Enter HPLTS\administrator's password: > > Sharename Type Comment > --------- ---- ------- > bock Disk > IPC$ IPC IPC Service (Samba 4.13.13-Debia...

Hi! We're using sernet-samba 3.0.28-21 on debian. (The smb.conf can be found below) There are 2 subfolders in root share directory "ponudbe" and "projects": srv03:/srv/data/test# getfacl * # file: ponudbe # owner: root # group: root user::rwx user:COMPANY+administrator:rwx group::r-x group:COMPANY+ponudbe_rw:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:user:COMPANY+administrator:rwx default:group::r-x default:group:COMPANY+ponudbe_rw:rwx default:mask::...

...read only = No [SYS] comment = "Orderprogram" path = /share2/SYS read only = No [SYS2] comment = "Industriapplikationer" path = /share2/SYS2 read only = No Permissions on the samba share looks like this administrator at hp-srv03:~$ cd /share2/ administrator at hp-srv03:/share2$ getfacl profiles/ # file: profiles/ # owner: administrator # group: root user::rwx user:administrator:rwx group::--- group:root:--- group:domain\040admins:rwx group:NT\040Authority\\system:rwx group:domain\040users:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:u...

...er for the legacy NT1 protocol due to a couple of old industrial systems that do not support SMB2/3. I noticed this today from the Samba server, probably doesnt mean anything but I still would like to ask the group. The server is of course joined to a domain and operates as it should. sysman at hp-srv03:~$ *net domain testjoin -U administrator* Enter administrator's password: Enumerating domains: Domain name Server name of Browse Master ------------- ---------------------------- *smb1cli_req_writev_submit: called for dialect[SMB3_11] server[127.0.0.1]* Cheers -- ------ -...

...due to a couple of old industrial systems > that do not support SMB2/3. > I noticed this today from the Samba server, probably doesnt mean > anything but I still would like to ask the group. The server is of > course joined to a domain and operates as it should. > > sysman at hp-srv03:~$ *net domain testjoin -U administrator* > Enter administrator's password: > > Enumerating domains: > > Domain name Server name of Browse Master > ------------- ---------------------------- > *smb1cli_req_writev_submit: called for dialect[SMB3_11] > se...

...ort 80 to port 3128 of squid in the load balancer doesn't works, the solution has a mix of ip route and iptables. Here is the script I wrote to configure transparent proxy. #!/bin/bash #Transparent proxy configuration #Variables VIP=192.168.18.10 WEB=80 SRV01=192.168.18.40 SRV02=192.168.18.41 SRV03=192.168.18.42 #Packet marking iptables -t mangle -F iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport $WEB --dst ! $VIP -j MARK --set-mark 2 #Routing table creation if [ $(grep -sq 'www\.out' /etc/iproute2/rt_tables) ]; then echo "Table exists" else echo "202 www.out"...

...t;./xe", ["./xe", "help", "-debug", "-s", "192.168.111.17", "-u", "root", "-pw", "bonjour"], [/* 28 vars */]) = 0 [ Process PID=21995 runs in 32 bit mode. ] uname({sys="Linux", node="devsys-srv03", ...}) = 0 brk(0)                                  = 0x9206000 brk(0x9206cb0)                          = 0x9206cb0 set_thread_area(0xffd0708c)             = 0 brk(0x9227cb0)                          = 0x9227cb0 brk(0x9228000)                          = 0x9228000 brk(0x9249000)                ...

...ently. When I look at the timestamps on Windows and Linux/Ext4, they look identical, down to the second. The command used is ROBOCOPY SOURCE TARGET /MIR /NDL /NFL /NP /COPYALL So, is there a Robocopy guru out there that can advise us? PS1. The smb.conf looks like this [global] netbios name = HP-SRV03 bind interfaces only = yes interfaces = lo ens3 realm = XAGAREN.SE server role = MEMBER SERVER security = ADS workgroup = HPLTS idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap config * : range = 10000-20000 idmap config HPLTS : backend = rid idmap config HPLTS : range = 30000-40000...

...? dos filemode = Yes ??????? hide unreadable = Yes You should also remove this, it should only be in a DC smb.conf: ??????? idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes Now we come to what could be a couple of typo's: You have 'netbios name = HP-FSSRV' but you also posted 'administrator at hp-srv03:~$ cd /share2/' The 'netbios name' must be the same as the hostname. You also seem to be using 'administrator' as a Unix user, please do not do this, I know this happens with the 'rid' backend, but in this instance Administrator will just be a normal Unix user. You a...

how do I create the separate log files of smb.log and nmb.log Just want a log of users who have accessed their accounts. Thanks in advance

On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 20:41:51 +0200 Anders ?stling via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello > I have an older Debian 11 with Samba 4.13 as domain member serving som > industrial systems with files. > Today I decided to upgrade both Debian (to 12) and Samba (to 4.17 and > then 4.20). The upgrade using the backport repo worked after some > extra steps. Som