search for: srsly

...tor iter = Obj.begin_sections (); iter != Obj.end_sections(); ++iter ) and it doesn't compile. There's no ++ for section iterators. Apparently, you're supposed to write. for (llvm::object::section_iterator iter = Obj.begin_sections (); iter != Obj.end_sections(); iter.increment(ec)) Srsly? [ And - how do I go from a section_iterator to a coff_section ? ] While I'm puzzling over that, I look some more, and I see: error_code getSection(int32_t index, const coff_section *&Res) const; Cool. (A bit weird; why a signed index?, but whatever) So I write: const llvm::object::coff...

...ere's also /usr/sbin/samba_kcc in there, - should go either to samba-ad-client > or samba-ad-dc, I can't understand which one. samba-ad-dc. It is called by the server. >> BTW, do we really need samba_downgrade_db these days?? Changing format to the >> one used by samba 4.7, srsly?? I'd just remove this one :) Yeah, maybe. It's there in case you just upgraded from 4.7 and found something went wrong, but I don't know if that has ever happened in practice. Douglas

Hello thar'! i'm glad to have discovered Wine! :D - wonderfull program. But srsly though; what i wanted to know; Does Wine support Alien Versus predator 2, on os X? - i've got AvP2 for PC, and the mac editions i've been able to find, have been created for PowerPC,.. - annoys me quite, it's a great game after all!

..._downgrade_db will go there.? Or maybe just introduce samba-ad pkg which > depends on samba and samba-ad-client, and includes python-based ad-specific > file server components. > > BTW, do we really need samba_downgrade_db these days?? Changing format to the > one used by samba 4.7, srsly?? I'd just remove this one :) Both samba_downgrade_db (if this one is really needed still) and samba_upgradedns (I found a reference to it in the wiki) can be part of samba-ad-dc package. Maybe together with samba_kcc (if it is not going to samba-ad-client). Thanks, /mjt -- GPG Key transiti...

...iter != Obj.end_sections(); ++iter ) > > and it doesn't compile. There's no ++ for section iterators. > Apparently, you're supposed to write. > for (llvm::object::section_iterator iter = Obj.begin_sections (); > iter != Obj.end_sections(); iter.increment(ec)) > Srsly? > [ And - how do I go from a section_iterator to a coff_section ? ] > > While I'm puzzling over that, I look some more, and I see: > error_code getSection(int32_t index, const coff_section *&Res) > const; > > Cool. (A bit weird; why a signed index?, but whatever...

...s (); iter != Obj.end_sections(); ++iter ) > > and it doesn't compile. There's no ++ for section iterators. > Apparently, you're supposed to write. >        for (llvm::object::section_iterator iter = Obj.begin_sections (); iter != Obj.end_sections(); iter.increment(ec)) > Srsly? > [ And - how do I go from a section_iterator to a coff_section ? ] That part of the interface is private to COFFObject. COFFObject itself isn't really designed to be used with the generic interface, although I'm very open to a better design that allows this in a sane way. > While...

...is case things like samba_downgrade_db will go there. Or maybe just introduce samba-ad pkg which depends on samba and samba-ad-client, and includes python-based ad-specific file server components. BTW, do we really need samba_downgrade_db these days? Changing format to the one used by samba 4.7, srsly? I'd just remove this one :) Do we really need samba-vfs-modules package? It looks like it should be just part of the file server (with optional dependencies), since it's almost always required. It's not the same situation as with samba-dsdb-modules. Another big question is about...

...(); ++iter ) > > > > and it doesn't compile. There's no ++ for section iterators. > > Apparently, you're supposed to write. > > for (llvm::object::section_iterator iter = Obj.begin_sections (); > iter != Obj.end_sections(); iter.increment(ec)) > > Srsly? > > [ And - how do I go from a section_iterator to a coff_section ? ] > > That part of the interface is private to COFFObject. COFFObject itself > isn't really designed to be used with the generic interface, although > I'm very open to a better design that allows this in...

Hey, I have this setup on my small test tinc-vpn. HostA (runs on a server and is publicly accessible) HostB (runs on my laptop (behind firewall) sometimes and connects to HostA) HostC (runs on a Amazon AWS server (behind firewall) to test long uptime and connects to HostA) This setup allows me to communicate from HostB to HostC thru HostA without any issues. Everything works great, but I

The DDRdrive X1 OpenSolaris device driver is now complete, please join us in our first-ever ZFS Intent Log (ZIL) beta test program. A select number of X1s are available for loan, preferred candidates would have a validation background and/or a true passion for torturing new hardware/driver :-) We are singularly focused on the ZIL device market, so a test environment bound by synchronous writes

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26980 Summary: GT230M/nouveau: X server hangs spontaneously Product: xorg Version: 7.5 Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org