search for: srikars

Hi Rowland, I followed your suggestions and changed the smb.conf file. Currently my smb.conf file looks like below. [global] workgroup = SAMDOM security = ADS realm = SAMDOM.LOCAL wins server = SAMDOM.LOCAL password server = SAMDOM.LOCAL domain master = no local master = no preferred master = no idmap backend = tdb idmap config *:range =

On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 17:25:43 +0530 Srikar Somineni <srikars at vedams.com> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > I followed your suggestions and changed the smb.conf file. > Currently my smb.conf file looks like below. > [global] > workgroup = SAMDOM > security = ADS > realm = SAMDOM.LOCAL > wins server = SAMDOM.LOCA...

Hi All, I am trying to migrate shares from my Win2k12 R2 AD server(SJCLAB2.LOCAL) to Ubuntu 16.04 samba fileserver present in same domain. Samba version is 4.3.11-Ubuntu. Before migrating shares I was able to successfully join fileserver to Active Directory. Below is my samba server configuration. #======================= Global Settings ======================= [global] workgroup =

Hi, We have an AD Forest in the following hierarchy made of parent and child domain controllers. Recently we joined an Ubuntu 16.04 server as a domain member to a Windows 2012 child domain controller. Integration was completed successfully. The domain user we used for joining to DC is a member of our own created "domain admins" group which has rights to join a domain member to

From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> This series replaces the existing paravirtualized spinlock mechanism with a paravirtualized ticketlock mechanism. The series provides implementation for both Xen and KVM. The current set of patches are for Xen/x86 spinlock/KVM guest side, to be included against -tip. A separate patchset for KVM host based on kvm tree is already

From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> This series replaces the existing paravirtualized spinlock mechanism with a paravirtualized ticketlock mechanism. The series provides implementation for both Xen and KVM. The current set of patches are for Xen/x86 spinlock/KVM guest side, to be included against -tip. A separate patchset for KVM host based on kvm tree is already

From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> This series replaces the existing paravirtualized spinlock mechanism with a paravirtualized ticketlock mechanism. The series provides implementation for both Xen and KVM. The current set of patches are for Xen/x86 spinlock/KVM guest side, to be included against -tip. A separate patchset for KVM host based on kvm tree is already

The 5-patch series to follow this email extends KVM-hypervisor and Linux guest running on KVM-hypervisor to support pv-ticket spinlocks, based on Xen's implementation. One hypercall is introduced in KVM hypervisor,that allows a vcpu to kick another vcpu out of halt state. The blocking of vcpu is done using halt() in (lock_spinning) slowpath. Note: 1) patch is based on 3.4-rc3 + ticketlock

The 5-patch series to follow this email extends KVM-hypervisor and Linux guest running on KVM-hypervisor to support pv-ticket spinlocks, based on Xen's implementation. One hypercall is introduced in KVM hypervisor,that allows a vcpu to kick another vcpu out of halt state. The blocking of vcpu is done using halt() in (lock_spinning) slowpath. Note: 1) patch is based on 3.4-rc3 + ticketlock

This series replaces the existing paravirtualized spinlock mechanism with a paravirtualized ticketlock mechanism. The series provides implementation for both Xen and KVM.(targeted for 3.5 window) Note: This needs debugfs changes patch that should be in Xen / linux-next https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/30/687 Changes in V8: - Reabsed patches to 3.4-rc4 - Combined the KVM changes with ticketlock

This series replaces the existing paravirtualized spinlock mechanism with a paravirtualized ticketlock mechanism. The series provides implementation for both Xen and KVM.(targeted for 3.5 window) Note: This needs debugfs changes patch that should be in Xen / linux-next https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/30/687 Changes in V8: - Reabsed patches to 3.4-rc4 - Combined the KVM changes with ticketlock

The 6-patch series to follow this email extends KVM-hypervisor and Linux guest running on KVM-hypervisor to support pv-ticket spinlocks, based on Xen's implementation. One hypercall is introduced in KVM hypervisor,that allows a vcpu to kick another vcpu out of halt state. The blocking of vcpu is done using halt() in (lock_spinning) slowpath. one MSR is added to aid live migration. Changes

The 6-patch series to follow this email extends KVM-hypervisor and Linux guest running on KVM-hypervisor to support pv-ticket spinlocks, based on Xen's implementation. One hypercall is introduced in KVM hypervisor,that allows a vcpu to kick another vcpu out of halt state. The blocking of vcpu is done using halt() in (lock_spinning) slowpath. one MSR is added to aid live migration. Changes

flight 17325 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17325/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 15 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-i386-xl 15 guest-stop

flight 17454 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17454/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail

flight 17612 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17612/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 9 guest-start.2 fail

flight 17901 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17901/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-i386-pv 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-amd64-pv 4

flight 17916 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17916/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-pv 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-amd64-xl 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 4

flight 18150 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/18150/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557 Regressions which are regarded as

flight 18181 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/18181/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557 Regressions which are regarded as