search for: sreerama

Hi All, I need some clarifications regarding the mismatch I found in the code and the specification. (a) In the specification, the bark(x) equation is given as: bark(x) = 13.1 atan(.00074x) + 2.24 atan(.0000000158(x^2)) + .0001x whereas in the code it is given as: #define toBARK(n) (13.1f*atan(.00074f*(n))+2.24f*atan((n)*(n)*1.85e-8f)+1e-4f*(n)) Which one of these is the proper one ? (b)

Hi, In case if I come up with my own implementation of the vorbis code, what is the way to certify the same ? Is there any conformance testing as in the case of MP3 ?? If so, who will be certifying the same ? Best regards, Nags.. Confidentiality Notice The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the

Hi, I need another clarification regarding the standard. In floor0 header decode (setup), the point no.7 says that if any of [floor0_order], [floor0_rate], [floor0_bark_map_size], floor0_amplitude_bits], [floor0_amplitude_offset] or [floor0_number_of_books] are less than zero, the stream is not decodable But as we see, all those values are read as unsigned integers. Now I'm not able to

We've made a little change that changed the output of vorbis is there a way to check the accuracy of the output against the original output? I also asked this question in the irc ... Thanks, Tal.