Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "srcidx".
Did you mean:
srcid
2012 Apr 23
0
[LLVMdev] SIV tests in LoopDependence Analysis, Sanjoy's patch
...rands from BasicAA),
adding*
* // trailing zeroes to the smaller GEP, if needed.*
* GEPOpdsTy destOpds, srcOpds;*
* for(GEPOperator::const_op_iterator destIdx = destGEP->idx_begin(),*
* destEnd = destGEP->idx_end(),*
* srcIdx = srcGEP->idx_begin(),*
* srcEnd = srcGEP->idx_end();*
* destIdx != destEnd && srcIdx != srcEnd;*
* destIdx += (destIdx != destEnd), srcIdx += (srcIdx != srcEnd)) {*
* const SCEV* destSCEV = (destIdx != destEnd) ? SE->getSCEV(*destId...
2012 Apr 12
6
[LLVMdev] SIV tests in LoopDependence Analysis, Sanjoy's patch
Hi,
Here is a preliminary (monolithic) version you can comment on. This
is still buggy, however, and I'll be testing for and fixing bugs over
the next few days. I've used your version of the strong siv test.
Thanks!
--
Sanjoy Das.
http://playingwithpointers.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: patch.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
2014 Jul 01
16
[LLVMdev] Usability of phabricator review threads for non-phab-users
Alp noted that the current setup on how phab reviews land on the list are
not working for him. I'd be curious whether his setup is special, or
whether there are more widespread problems. If this is more widely
perceived as a problem, please speak up, and I'll make sure to prioritize
the fixes (note that this is unrelated to the "lost email" problem - those
are always highest