search for: squirting

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 G'day The attached patch adds "first draft" support for service location protocol, using OpenSLP (http://www.openslp.org). This allows you to automagically discover all the rsync servers on your network (which is defined in terms of your SLP configuration - typically equal to multicast scope, but you can change it around with

Hi 조영필, > I want to manipulate LLVM-backend to emit other compiler's IR, in this case, > VPO's IR. > So, what i want to know is.. Is there a project to be referred? (For example, > "Do LLVM-backend -> GIMPLE" project exist?) as far as I know there is no LLVM IR -> gimple pass. LLVM used to have a C backend that turned LLVM IR into C. I think it was removed

Hello, all. I want to manipulate LLVM-backend to emit other compiler's IR, in this case, VPO's IR. So, what i want to know is.. Is there a project to be referred? (For example, "Do LLVM-backend -> GIMPLE" project exist?) Or, how can I manipulate it easily? Thanks, Cho Yeong-pil -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I am writing a application where there is a lot of data in an old Filemaker program that I am going to need to do a 1 time import...1 main table and 2 related tables. I can get the data from Filemaker into a dbf or csv or Excel file without problem. Is anyone aware of a utility for postgresql or a rails plug-in that might make this easier? I am worried about Rails import since I can''t

...nary interface"). In order to conform to the standard, the object code produced by LLVM also needs to pass the struct in the same way. That said, you could imagine that in the bitcode the struct would be passed as a struct, rather than double+float, and the code generators would take care of squirting out the appropriate double+float machine code. Sadly this is not the case: ABI conformance is handled in the front-end. The fundamental reason for this is that some ABI's (eg: the x86-64 one) specify how parameters are passed based on type information that is available in C but not in LLVM. F...

Hi, this is to let people know that the recently released LLVM 2.2 compiler toolkit contains experimental support for Ada through the llvm-gcc-4.2 compiler. Currently the only platform it works on is linux running on 32 bit intel x86. This is because that's what I run, and I'm the only one who's been working on this. I would appreciate help from other Ada guys, both for porting to

Uh, sorry, did not pay attention where I was replying ;) Hey Duncan, I do not understand why this behaviour is required. What is the problem in having a function receive a single struct-parameter with three floats compared to two scalar parameters? source-code (C++): struct Test3Float { float a, b, c; }; void test(Test3Float param, Test3Float* result) { ... } bitcode:

Hi, Target architecture for llc can be specified using -march, -mcpu, -mattr options. Is it possible to override target CPU attributes when using llvm-gcc compiler? Regards, Sergey Y.

[Copying to the public mailing list] On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:27:41AM +0000, SOUTHWICK Matthew wrote: > Regarding virt-v2v > > CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core) > virt-v2v-1.36.10-6.el7_5.2.x86_64 > > I have to use virt-v2v-copy-to-local and then convert and squirt into my export domain, we do not have vSphere. You should be able to use the SSH method. It's faster

Hello, Is there a way to broadcast a message with smbclient -M? Also, is there some utility out there with user interface where I can select which machines should receive the message and then send it out? Thanks, Tomas

Is it possible to configure llc to generate code for other architectures? For instance, what I need to do to generate Sparc machine code? Thanks. --Gang -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100316/253bd016/attachment.html>

On 13/09/12 10:57, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi 조영필, > > > I want to manipulate LLVM-backend to emit other compiler's IR, in this case, >> VPO's IR. >> So, what i want to know is.. Is there a project to be referred? (For example, >> "Do LLVM-backend -> GIMPLE" project exist?) > > as far as I know there is no LLVM IR -> gimple pass. LLVM

Hi, I have a problem I will describe. I have PAP2 connected to the internet to an asterisk box with 2 TDM cards, one TE100P E1 with PRI and one TDM400P with 2 FXS an one FXO. When I call to the TDM400 cards from the PAP2 eveything is OK, sound quality is perfect. When I call to terminate the call in PSTN through E100P I hear clicks which aparently are RTP packet looses. This clicks are only heard

Hi all, For months now I''ve been using Puppet with PuppetDB backend to manage my Nagios configs. We now have 1200+ services being checked and including servicedependency, host, hostdependency, command and other Nagios resources being managed, that''s about 3000 resources in total. Unfortunately this means the monitoring server takes about 8 minutes to perform a Puppet run.

Sometimes guestfsd fails to gather info, and the virt-<tool> -v output is usually not useful to figure out whats going on within the temporary guest. I see the /init script has support to run guestfsd with a debug tool, which is currently valgrind. Granted, valgrind support is a compile time thing. What would be a good way to optionally run guestfsd with strace or gdb? Should each tool get a

Hey everybody, I am struggling to get rid of a problem which seems to be related to a multi-return value optimization: I generate bitcode for a c++-function with llvm-g++ which is then linked, transformed and optimized at runtime using LLVM. The function has quite a few parameters, including structs and struct-pointers with 3 float fields. The problem is, that I require the function to preserve

<moving this to llvmdev instead of commits> On Jan 22, 2008, at 11:23 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: >> Okay, well we already get many other x86-64 issues wrong already, but >> Evan is chipping away at it. How do you pass an array by value in C? >> Example please, > > I find the x86-64 ABI hard to interpret, but it seems to say that > aggregates are classified