search for: sqlite3diet

On Apr 24, 2008, at 9:03 AM, Gabor Greif wrote: > > As you can see, the use-diet changes actually lower the build time > of kimwitu++! (this is as of yesterday's r50182). > Parity is not only reached, but surpassed. Thanks for these numbers. Do you know how much of this increase is due to co-allocating Use arrays with their users, and how much is due to the actual shrinking of

Hi all, in the last days I was busy gathering performance data about the "class Use"-related changes. I have nice measurements on a 8Gig MacPro with kimwitu++. This is important to say, because this machine is in plenty of memory, so swapping is not likely, which means that in more constrained setups (when swapping occurs) the use-diet approach is probably producing even better