search for: spx_ilog2

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "spx_ilog2".

2007 Aug 06
2
Attempting to shrink speex: Are these functions necessary?
...ack_signed speex_bits_peek_unsigned speex_bits_peek speex_bits_nbytes speex_bits_insert_terminator In cd_search.c: noise_codebook_quant noise_codebook_unquant In filters.c: compute_rms syn_percep_zero16 qmf_decomp qmf_synth In ltp.c: forced_pitch_quant forced_pitch_unquant In math_approx.c: spx_ilog2 _spx_cos_pi_2 spx_cos_norm spx_exp2 spx_atan In nb_celp.c: nb_encoder_destroy nb_decoder_destroy In quant_lsp.c: lsp_quant_nb lsp_unquant_nb lsp_quant_high lsp_unquant_high In speex.c: speex_encoder_destroy speex_decoder_destroy speex_encode speex_decode nb_mode_query wb_mode_query speex_lib_...
2007 Aug 07
1
Attempting to shrink speex: Are these functions necessary?
...; noise_codebook_unquant No need for that (assuming you only want 8 kbps). > In filters.c: > compute_rms > syn_percep_zero16 > qmf_decomp > qmf_synth No need for that. > In ltp.c: > forced_pitch_quant > forced_pitch_unquant No need for that. > In math_approx.c: > spx_ilog2 > _spx_cos_pi_2 > spx_cos_norm > spx_exp2 > spx_atan No need for that. > In nb_celp.c: > nb_encoder_destroy > nb_decoder_destroy No need for that if you never plan on freeing the memory > In quant_lsp.c: > lsp_quant_nb > lsp_unquant_nb > lsp_quant_high > lsp_...
2007 Aug 07
1
Attempting to shrink speex: Are these functions necessary?
...rt_terminator > > In cd_search.c: > noise_codebook_quant > noise_codebook_unquant > > In filters.c: > compute_rms > syn_percep_zero16 > qmf_decomp > qmf_synth > > In ltp.c: > forced_pitch_quant > forced_pitch_unquant > > In math_approx.c: > spx_ilog2 > _spx_cos_pi_2 > spx_cos_norm > spx_exp2 > spx_atan > > In nb_celp.c: > nb_encoder_destroy > nb_decoder_destroy > > In quant_lsp.c: > lsp_quant_nb > lsp_unquant_nb > lsp_quant_high > lsp_unquant_high > > In speex.c: > speex_encoder_destroy &...
2007 Jan 25
1
Minor fixed point scaling problem
First, let me say that I think the speex code is incredible in the way it supports floating and fixed point code from one set of code. The same is true for supporting multiple processors, etc... I've used speex with the PC, TI 64xx and 55xx. Please view the following comments not as an attack on speex (which I think is incredible!) but as my contribution to an open source project. I know
2007 Aug 07
0
Attempting to shrink speex: Are these functions necessary?
...s speex_bits_insert_terminator >> >> In cd_search.c: noise_codebook_quant noise_codebook_unquant >> >> In filters.c: compute_rms syn_percep_zero16 qmf_decomp qmf_synth >> >> In ltp.c: forced_pitch_quant forced_pitch_unquant >> >> In math_approx.c: spx_ilog2 _spx_cos_pi_2 spx_cos_norm spx_exp2 >> spx_atan >> >> In nb_celp.c: nb_encoder_destroy nb_decoder_destroy >> >> In quant_lsp.c: lsp_quant_nb lsp_unquant_nb lsp_quant_high >> lsp_unquant_high >> >> In speex.c: speex_encoder_destroy speex_decoder_d...