Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "spruious".
Did you mean:
serious
2007 Apr 20
3
[LLVMdev] SCEV ordering
...ugh for SCEVUnknown it
would require an ordering for Value objects, and I don't really
want this to get complicated. I'm considering just using
getValueID() as a primary sort and then using the value name to
sort values of the same kind. Using names is straight-forward, but
it could lead to spruious reorderings, since the names are
arbitrary.
Is there anything I'm missing here? Or, would there be other uses
for a general ordering for Values?
Dan
--
Dan Gohman, Cray Inc.
2007 Apr 20
0
[LLVMdev] SCEV ordering
...ould require
> an ordering for Value objects, and I don't really want this to get
> complicated. I'm considering just using getValueID() as a primary sort
> and then using the value name to sort values of the same kind. Using
> names is straight-forward, but it could lead to spruious reorderings,
> since the names are arbitrary.
>
> Is there anything I'm missing here? Or, would there be other uses
> for a general ordering for Values?
I'm strongly in favor of more canonicalization. The problem is that we
can't sort on the natural key (the address of t...
2007 Apr 23
1
[LLVMdev] SCEV ordering
...gt; an ordering for Value objects, and I don't really want this to get
> > complicated. I'm considering just using getValueID() as a primary sort
> > and then using the value name to sort values of the same kind. Using
> > names is straight-forward, but it could lead to spruious reorderings,
> > since the names are arbitrary.
> >
> > Is there anything I'm missing here? Or, would there be other uses
> > for a general ordering for Values?
>
> I'm strongly in favor of more canonicalization. The problem is that we
> can't sort o...