search for: sprinkling

In a lattice 11x11 with 6 repetitions, we want to compare lines to their two parents. 3 of the 6 repetitions are sprinkled and the 3 others not. There are 5 factors : hm (hydrous mode), variety, block, rep and grandrep. grandrep gathers two repetition, a sprinkled and a not (as in Split Plot !). I use lme but I have problems in random. Can someone help me ? Ibnou DIENG

Sprinkling my examples with ''lambda'' has always seemed like a bit of a wart to me. I''ve gotten into the habit of adding ''alias :calling :lambda'' to my spec suites. My examples then look like: calling { Foo }.should raise_error calling { Bar }.should_not raise_erro...

Mason Wheeler <masonwheeler at yahoo.com> writes: >>If the following statement is true, then which build system to choose >>is a no-brainer: > >>> cmake, while ugly, can be made to support all of our use cases. There >>> are some use cases that autoconf+make can't support >>-- Chandler Carruth, On 21 Jun 2012, at 01:19 > > Unfortunately, >

Hey all. This morning I found that my audio playback is randomly sprinkled with sound skips and dropouts. I went to /var/log/yum.log and found this: Feb 09 20:18:22 Updated: lame-3.99.4-2.el6.rf.i686 I'm not saying that caused the problem but it's all I could find that changed. When I ls in /dev there is no dsp entry. That would explain why mplayer Can't open audio device

...he "User Manual" in a couple of minutes), the site states five minutes to load, so waiting more than 30 mins should have been OK, and they do have this "Please Powercycle" in red print too... Is there a magic re-incarnation routine ? (Power on whilst holding down some buttons?, Sprinkling chickens blood?) I chose an HTTP upgrade over TFTP - as I read that there were potential issues with TFTP at this firmware level. -- . . ___. .__ Posix Systems - Sth Africa. e.164 VOIP ready /| /| / /__ mje@posix.co.za - Mark J Elkins, Cisco CCIE / |/ |ARK \_/ /__ LK...

HI all, I''ve got a migration that creates a few new tables and populates a bunch of data into those tables from existing models. It works great. As expected. Tables are created. Relationships are made. Everything comes out fine as far as the data goes. But for some reason the migration task ends with this error: rake aborted! negative argument I''ve liberally sprinkled my

...terates over the rows, it uses as.matrix() to convert the dataframe to a character representation of itself. Thus my database's carefully planned data types (that RODBC carefully preserved when returning query results) get completely lost as I process the data. I've taken to judiciously sprinkling as.numeric() and friends here and there, but this is just begging for bugs. In other words, what is the smart way to process a dataframe by rows? Or is there, by chance, a specific technique or practice that is available for RODBC results but not for dataframes in general? Thank you for your t...

All, I would like to propose a fairly significant change to the unused argument warning (i.e., removing it for the most part), but wanted to get some feedback before investing a great deal of time. In my opinion, the implementation of this warning is overly burdensome to maintain. Worse yet, there are _many_ cases where the driver intentionally claims unused arguments to prevent this warning

I think that absolute atoms will need something similar to, "contentType" added. SHN_ABS symbols can have different types, STT_OBJECT, STT_FILE and maybe others. In order for the writer to tell it must have a way to reach back and ask the atom what type of symbols caused it to be created. To that end I added a contentType method to AbsoluteAtom and sprinkled changes around to

Dear R Wizards---is it possible to get R to show its current call stack (sys.calls()) upon an error abort? I don't use ESS for execution, and it is often not obvious how to locate how I triggered an error in an R internal function. Seeing the call stack would make this easier. (right now, I sprinkle "cat" statements everywhere, just to locate the line where the error appears.) Of

Andrew Lenharth wrote: > On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 05:04 +0900, Duraid Madina wrote: >> - No varargs > > What are your issues here? Or are they simply at the "not implemented > so I don't know" stage? The two bugs I mentioned (no varargs, no alloca) are pretty much two sides of the same coin: I'm ignoring the IA64 stack frame layout (for no good reason), so

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:20:05 +0100 Sven Schwedas <sven.schwedas at tao.at> wrote: > > > PS, your configs are still wrong. > > It would be *really* helpful if you explained *why*. Sprinkling magic > pixie dust over random config files isn't exactly purposeful > debugging. > Lets start with /etc/krb5.conf Samba doesn't need most of what you will find in it, this is mostly because most of what you will find there, is a default setting. Believe it, or believe it not, y...

...are of…? I have > been able to build LLVM as a shared library using Autotools and GCC (through > MinGW) on Windows (as well as on Linux and Mac OS X), so it would really be > a shame if the same couldn’t be done using Visual C++… > > Cheers, Alan. The problem is that MSVC++ requires sprinkling __declspec(dllexport/dllimport) all over the code, and we really don't want to deal with maintaining that, as most developers have little to no experience with Windows DLLs. There may be a work around for this, which I partially implemented in the past. You have a script which automatically ge...

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:54:20PM -0800, Sinclair Yeh wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:45:27PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Sinclair Yeh <syeh at vmware.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > <snip> > > > >> > */ > > >> > -#define VMMOUSE_CMD(cmd, in1, out1, out2,

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:54:20PM -0800, Sinclair Yeh wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:45:27PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Sinclair Yeh <syeh at vmware.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > <snip> > > > >> > */ > > >> > -#define VMMOUSE_CMD(cmd, in1, out1, out2,

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:44:34PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Now that the plane code takes the underscan setup into account, we can > safely attach the underscan props to the HDMI connector. > > We also take care of filling AVI infoframes correctly to expose the > top/botton/left/right bar. > > Note that these underscan props match pretty well the >

...9;m sorry for chiming in late. > >> I propose to add the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro for specifying intended fall-through locations between switch cases. > > I don't really see that the tradeoff here is worthwhile. It is possible that we have some fallthrough bugs, but the cost of sprinkling this macro everywhere doesn't seem like the right tradeoff. > While I tend to agree with you, it's also true that for many (most?) of the locations where we have an intentional fall through, there's already a comment to that effect as a matter of style. This would simply formalize...

...ding. This two-line addition to attrib.c gives a significant speedup for listing an environment's names/keys (2-60X depending on the 'sorted' argument). It also simplifies the environment API by making it more like the other basic types. We already have $ and [[ after all. Rather than sprinkling sorted=FALSE throughout the methods and base code, let's use names. Would you be open to this change? I have submitted a patch and some timings to the bug tracker as https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16170 Regards, Pete ____________________ Peter M. Haverty, Ph.D. Genente...

>----- Original Message ----- >From: Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> >You are misinformed. The LLVM CMake scripts can build LLVM/Clang as >shared libraries since almost day one. > >If you are thinking of Windows, well, there is a fundamental limitation >there, not an issue with CMake. Autoconf has a hack for building LLVM as >a single, monolithic dll while using

>From: Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? > >As for Visual Studio, autoconf is pretty useless, >so no dll's there in any case until someone sprinkles the LLVM C++ >sources with the necessary declarations. Thinking about this a little more, is that even necessary?  Exporting the C++ API in a DLL is useless due