search for: sppedup

...------------- and what I get is (password not matter): ---------------------------------------------------- $rsync -Sav ${bianco_ip}::bianco-home /home/bianco --delete-after receiving file list ... done deleting atouchs sent 63 bytes? received 115 bytes? 50.76 bytes/sec total size is 0 sppedup is 0.00 $ ---------------------------------------------------- So rsync delete the 'atouchs' file!!! why??? NB: doing instead: ---------------------------------------------------- $rsync -Sav -f 'P *touch*' ${bianco_ip}::bianco-home /home/bianco --delete-after receiving fi...

...pports the power of .Call over .C. But my probably naive question is why does this work for my code with R but not R-devel? And another question is related to using .Call. Based on the manual page, I do not need to change the function parameters when using .Call. So I can run like this: .Call("sppedUp", D, S, pD, pS, nrow(D), as.integer(N), length(N), ssq[i], i, as.integer(B), overlaps, overlaps.P) But I am receiving the memory(?) related error: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc' what(): std::bad_alloc Now that I am running the code using...

...is work > for my code with R but not R-devel? Because of the change mentioned in the NEWS file. > And another question is related to using .Call. Based on the manual > page, I do not need to change the function parameters when using > .Call. So I can run like this: > .Call("sppedUp", D, S, pD, pS, nrow(D), as.integer(N), length(N), > ssq[i], i, as.integer(B), overlaps, overlaps.P) > > But I am receiving the memory(?) related error: > terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc' > what(): std::bad_alloc > Now tha...

Hi, Within my R code, I am using a C++ function as below: overlaps <- matrix(0, nrow=B, ncol=length(N)) overlaps.P <- matrix(0, nrow=B, ncol=length(N)) .C("speedUp", D, S, pD, pS, nrow(D), as.integer(N), length(N), ssq[i], i, as.integer(B), overlaps, overlaps.P, DUP=FALSE) the function "speedUp", is supposed to update matrices overlaps

I would like to know whether there is a faster way to do the below operation (updating vec1). My objective is to update the elements of a vector (vec1), where a particular element i is dependent on the previous one. I need to do this on vectors that are 1 million or longer and need to repeat that process several hundred times. The for loop works but is slow. If there is a faster way, please let

...innyP ;[AppDefaults\\winnyp.exe\\DllOverrides] ;"comctl32" = "native" ; ;;Lunascape ;[AppDefaults\\Luna.exe\\DllOverrides] ;"comctl32" = "native" ; ;;Mame file 2 ;[AppDefaults\\mame2.exe\\DllOverrides] ;"comctl32" = "native" ;OpenJane_IE sppedup hack [AppDefaults\\Jane2ch.exe\\DllOverrides] "mlang" = "builtin, native" ;"comctl32" = "native" ;;Internet Explorer ;[AppDefaults\\iexplore.exe\\DllOverrides] ;"mlang" = "builtin, native" ;IE4,5,6 Installer [AppDefaults\\grpconv.exe\\Ver...