search for: spoofers

..." dealing with Yahoo!'s >> change, others have chosen to do nothing... > > We should stop for a sec and think if what yahoo did was good or not to fight > spammers; I think it was good. A list that impersonates a sender is not a good approach. Don't confuse spammers and spoofers. This is a critical distinction. Both are commonly handled by "spam" filters. Not all spoofers are spammers (mailing list traffic; people who try to send through a local MTA due to network policies blocking their home MTA) and not all spammers are spoofers (think malware or compromised...

ALL, Our Primary DNS has been broken into twice in the last week. The first time it happened I noticed the hacker used named for means of gaining entry. This guy was good at hiding his/her tracks so we reinstalled the OS and left a minimum install to see if it was done again. We logged all goings on from a secure remote machine. We got the hacker''s IP address and even some of what

> As per > prior discussions, the "From:" field should remain > with the > original sender. One (important) > reason is that frequent participants > in the > Syslinux Mailing List tend to use the "From:" > field, for > instance as search filter. Well I consider the search filter by subject is a much better approach, for participating on a

> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hi Gene: > > Everything that comes from the list goes to my spam folder > > because the message looks as spam to yahoo. > > A simple filter resolves this: > > Deliver to "Inbox" if > To/CC contains "syslinux at zytor.com" > > > why is

Hi, I'm resending since I got no feedback: I assume that the message was lost... The attached patch fixes a few bugs related to the spoofing portmapper used by nfsmount. Regards, Louis -- Dr Louis Rilling Kerlabs Skype: louis.rilling Batiment Germanium Phone: (+33|0) 6 80 89 08 23 80 avenue des Buttes de Coesmes http://www.kerlabs.com/ 35700 Rennes -------------- next part

I got a call from an overseas call center telling me about the problems with the Windows machine I was using. They wanted to remote in and fix things for me ... (Ignore the fact I use a MacBook Pro or an ASUS laptop with Debian). What I found curious was the caller's name was Asterisk, and the caller's number was Asterisk at 10 or or Astrk at 10 similar. (I don't recall the exact

>Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 22:07:49 -0700 >To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com >From: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com> >Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP / IAX over satellite > >[post re-ordered chronologically] > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com >>[mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tilghman

Various coding style fixes checkpatch warns about. The goal is not to be 100% checkpatch compliant, but to have more consistent coding style. As this is a trivial patch serie, will land in 24 hours in klibc git, unless of course ml review hits a bugger. Checked with size(3) that the generated kinit, fstype, ipconfig and nfsmount are the same. maximilian attems (4): [klibc] ipconfig: reduce

Many thanks to the moderator who pointed out errors and suggested the correct information on this post. Over half the ideas are due to him. ;) Don't forget this is about writing your own daemon or TCP program. Some of the ideas here will not happen with today's software that has been hardened. It is presented to prevent your software from being taken advantage of. Most often,