search for: spoo

...20, 2020 10:34:53 PM CET, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > via rsync wrote: > > > > I'm still not sure if rsync requires a cryptographic hash _or_ if a > > strong hash like xxHash64 would be just fine for the job. > > I'm fairly sure the hash should *not* be easy to spoof, so I'd say a > cryptographic hash is needed. > > As an example, if a file is replaced by a file of the same size and same > hash, > rsync (if -c is in use) will consider the file is the same, and avoid > copying it. correct. The same goes for currently used md5 which has k...

My mail server is running on a Fedora FC5 box. I need to move the mail server to another computer and so I need to back up my user's mail and move it. I have found mail in /var/spoo/mail/[users] and in their home directories there is a 'mail' directory. All users have an 'Inbox' file that is empty and I think the one IMAP user has a 'Trash' file that is huge! Are those the only files I need to copy or are there others lurking out there that I don&...

I tried to share my spool directory so I could get monitored calls, and now this error comes up when I try to leave a message in any of my voicemail boxes. Mar 24 12:48:35 WARNING[344081]: app_voicemail.c:1488 leave_voicemail: Error opening text file for o utput -- Recording the message Mar 24 12:48:35 WARNING[344081]...

...ackage seem to not work. - the printer is correctly set up with LPRng (lpr <file> prints file correctly). However when I connect to the share with smbclient \\\\Storm\\Cannon_Linux -U davoid, I supply my password and put a file, it doesn't get printed out! nor does it appear in /var/spoo/samba. Permissions of /var/spool/samba seem correct. Everybody can read, write, execute /var/spool/samba. Note that the same operation under Linux works. I have even tried using the same smb.conf under fbsd as under Linux. Still can't print! Here's my current smb.conf ================...

On 2020-02-20 20:06:39 [+0100], Markus Ueberall wrote: > On 2020-02-09 23:19, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > [...] > > My primar motivation to use SHA1 for checksumming (by default) instead > > of MD5 is not the additional security bits but performance. On a decent > > x86 box the SHA1 performance is almost the same as MD5's but with > > acceleration it