Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "spongy".
Did you mean:
spong
2017 Sep 09
3
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
...A?????? N/A Y?????? 3667
Task Status of Volume brick1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are no active volume tasks
When we return the c1g node, we do see a "pause" in the VMs as the
shards heal. By pause meaning a terminal session gets spongy, but that
passes pretty quickly.
Also are your VMs mounted in libvirt with caching? We always use
cache='none' so we can migrate around easily.
Finally, you seem to be using oVirt/RHEV. Is it possible that your platform is triggering a protective response on the VMs (by suspending).
-...
2017 Sep 09
0
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
...t; Task Status of Volume brick1
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> There are no active volume tasks
>
> When we return the c1g node, we do see a "pause" in the VMs as the shards
> heal. By pause meaning a terminal session gets spongy, but that passes
> pretty quickly.
Hmm, do you see any errors in VM's dmesg? Or any other reasons for "sponginess"?
> Also are your VMs mounted in libvirt with caching? We always use
> cache='none' so we can migrate around easily.
No cache, virtio:
<disk ty...
2017 Sep 09
2
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
...lume brick1
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> There are no active volume tasks
>>
>> When we return the c1g node, we do see a "pause" in the VMs as the shards
>> heal. By pause meaning a terminal session gets spongy, but that passes
>> pretty quickly.
>
> Hmm, do you see any errors in VM's dmesg? Or any other reasons for "sponginess"?
>
>> Also are your VMs mounted in libvirt with caching? We always use
>> cache='none' so we can migrate around easily.
>
>...
2017 Sep 08
0
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
2017-09-08 14:11 GMT+02:00 Pavel Szalbot <pavel.szalbot at gmail.com>:
> Gandalf, SIGKILL (killall -9 glusterfsd) did not stop I/O after few
> minutes. SIGTERM on the other hand causes crash, but this time it is
> not read-only remount, but around 10 IOPS tops and 2 IOPS on average.
> -ps
So, seems to be reliable to server crashes but not to server shutdown :)
2005 Aug 06
3
SPA 841 form SIPURA
Hello,
How good is :SPA 841 form SIPURA.
Thanks
Varun
2017 Sep 08
4
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
Gandalf, SIGKILL (killall -9 glusterfsd) did not stop I/O after few
minutes. SIGTERM on the other hand causes crash, but this time it is
not read-only remount, but around 10 IOPS tops and 2 IOPS on average.
-ps
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Diego Remolina <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote:
> I currently only have a Windows 2012 R2 server VM in testing on top of
> the gluster storage,