search for: spoked

Samba 4.5.1 (started with this version as well) I started with 3 domain controllers, DC1 and DC2 at the hub, and another, DC3 as a spoke. Everything was running smoothly with this config. No problems with 'samba-tool drs showrepl'. As soon as I started adding more 'spoke' domain controllers I'm getting timeouts in the 'samba-tool drs showrepl' command. I believe

Hi, It seems unlikely that the KCC is the cause of these issues. The KCC is only responsible for telling who to connect (and when) and doesn't actually affect any underlying network connectivity. Connectivity between the spokes should not be required and the communication between them is usually just some stale data. But none of that should affect either of these commands. Unless the DRS

Hi, Reason behind that is we have some use cases wouldn’t like to make some nodes to become the transit node, but there’re some other nodes in the topology act as the transit nodes. So if the tinc node forward subnet update it learning from one side to the other side, then it possible to become transit node if one side only have route to go through it. That node I would call it “spoke-only”

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Garming Sam <garming at catalyst.net.nz> wrote: > Hi, > > It seems unlikely that the KCC is the cause of these issues. The KCC is > only responsible for telling who to connect (and when) and doesn't > actually affect any underlying network connectivity. Connectivity > between the spokes should not be required and the communication

Alan& Akemi, Would it be possible to get CONFIG_ARPD turned on in the centosplus 6.x kernel? It is required to use opennhrp. See the link below where is was decided to turn it on in Fedora. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502844 -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark at netwolves.com

Hi all, I am new to Tinc VPN and really would like to make full benefit of this implementation if possible. I would like to know whether I will be able to use Tinc to its full potential. My current setup is as follows, IPfire router/firewall(openvpn client) --->ISP(Internet)--->Amazon VPS(openvpn server). The ipfire router is behind a CARRIER-GRADE NAT, I am able to reach the network

Hi - Linux: Ubuntu 9.10 all updates applied as of 9/5/2010. Samba: 3.4.0 smb.conf global section: [global] netbios name=blahblahblah sever string=Domain Master workgroup=blahblahblah encrypt passwords=true wins support=yes domain master=yes local master=yes preferred master=yes os level=255 security=user domain logons=yes passdb backend=smbpasswd logon script=%U.bat add machine script=sudo

On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Ah, depends on the image type. We spoke reset for an NBP though. ?! //mirabilos -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstra?e 2-4, D-53123 Bonn ? http://www.tarent.de/ Tel: +49 228 54881-393 ? Fax: +49 228 54881-235 HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) ? USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg

Hello Lartc Mailing List: Been working on something the last week and a half and ALMOST have it working.., just need a few pointers from the wizards on this mailing list to nail it. Ok, my setup is a hub and spoke arrangement, hub is Cisco 2821 with IOS 12.4. Spokes are ruggencom RX1000 routers, Debian based with the following versions installed: rx1000test:~# uname -a Linux rx1000test

Moving to the LLVM Dev list & cc'ing Lang. On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Joshua Gerrard via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello folks, > > I’m developing an application that uses Orc JIT for C++, which works > swimmingly on Mac OS X. However, the Windows version has been a battle and > a half, and it’s now at the point where I need some assistance

Thank you for your reply. If you happen to read the post of 11/22, you will notice that it was not me who spoke ill of Samba. I put my bets on other people being able to figure it out; I hope that one of them will help me. Sincerely jimc

On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 08:09:52AM +0800, Bright Zhao wrote: > Reason behind that is we have some use cases wouldn’t like to make some nodes to become the transit node, but there’re some other nodes in the topology act as the transit nodes. > > So if the tinc node forward subnet update it learning from one side to the other side, then it possible to become transit node if one side only

Thanks for all your help. I've been reading thru the tinc manual, but was having a hard time finding an explanation of the security/trust model. I'm interested in using tinc in a business production environment, so I just want to make sure I have it secured properly. Would spokes loose their connection we each other if the hub went offline? Also, what's the minimum required exchange

On 12/03/2014 08:43 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> Ah, depends on the image type. We spoke reset for an NBP though. > > ?! > Should, not spoke. -hpa

Greetings: I'm in the situation where I'm trying to splash information picked off by an asterisk IVR into a Cisco call center environment. I'm under the impression that the ONLY way to do this is to setup socket connections with the Cisco "voice processor", or CVP, and send packets corresponding to GED-125. Cisco has a detailed 100+-page document detailing the internals of

Has anybody gotten :hard_breaks to work with RedCloth? I''m doing: self.body_html = RedCloth.new(self.body).to_html(:textile) which works, except that it doesn''t transform hard breaks to <br /> tags, which is really important for me. However, if I do: self.body_html = RedCloth.new(self.body, [ :hard_breaks ]).to_html(:textile) then it converts ALL breaks into <br

Hi Peoples I am having problems with meetme, in that it responds with "conf-invalid" when I dial a conference number. I notice that there is a note with regards to ztdummy, and the need for that to be loaded. Is this still the case? Is meetme dependent on this module? I do NOT use zaptel cards in my system, and there for zaptel is not loading. Can anyone shed some light

We've had a lot of churn in all the trunks (llvm, llvm-gcc, clang) recently, and the testing buildbots have been failing repeatedly. I spoke with Chris this AM, and he suggested we have a "stabilization day." Please avoid large, destabilizing changes for about twenty-four hours. We would like for the testing bots to begin working again. Thanks, stuart

On Aug 3, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Aaron Gray wrote: > Hi Chris, > > It would be good to get to try to get it as functional as possible > at some point, before abandoning it..maye once I have one the COFF > backend. I'm not proposing to remove COFF support from the asmprinter, just masm support. Using gas will continue to work fine. > Anyway I wll report back when I have

Hi all, First, this is not my first PRI/T1 Asterisk deployement. Did several with Bell, Telus, AllStream, Rogers but this is my first with Videotron. Just spoke with the person taking the order and on top of the standard settings (switch, coding,...) she asked me about data rate (56k or 64k). Since I have never been asked this question before and can find anything relevant in the