search for: spoke

Samba 4.5.1 (started with this version as well) I started with 3 domain controllers, DC1 and DC2 at the hub, and another, DC3 as a spoke. Everything was running smoothly with this config. No problems with 'samba-tool drs showrepl'. As soon as I started adding more 'spoke' domain controllers I'm getting timeouts in the 'samba-tool drs showrepl' command. I believe the problem is arising because the spok...

Hi, It seems unlikely that the KCC is the cause of these issues. The KCC is only responsible for telling who to connect (and when) and doesn't actually affect any underlying network connectivity. Connectivity between the spokes should not be required and the communication between them is usually just some stale data. But none of that should affect either of these commands. Unless the DRS server is particular busy, it points to actual connectivity issues. If you're running samba-tool drs showrepl, it looks like it sh...

...become the transit node, but there’re some other nodes in the topology act as the transit nodes. So if the tinc node forward subnet update it learning from one side to the other side, then it possible to become transit node if one side only have route to go through it. That node I would call it “spoke-only” node, which dual/triple connection go to multiple “hub” node, “hub” definitely need to forward traffic for the “spoke”, but “spoke” shouldn’t forward subnets learning from one “hub” to another. Any idea to achieve this in one tinc “network”?

...m <garming at catalyst.net.nz> wrote: > Hi, > > It seems unlikely that the KCC is the cause of these issues. The KCC is > only responsible for telling who to connect (and when) and doesn't > actually affect any underlying network connectivity. Connectivity > between the spokes should not be required and the communication between > them is usually just some stale data. But none of that should affect > either of these commands. > > Unless the DRS server is particular busy, it points to actual > connectivity issues. If you're running samba-tool drs showr...

Alan& Akemi, Would it be possible to get CONFIG_ARPD turned on in the centosplus 6.x kernel? It is required to use opennhrp. See the link below where is was decided to turn it on in Fedora. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502844 -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark at netwolves.com

...hrough openvpn from anywhere (using an open vpn client connecting to Amazon VPS which is the openvpn server) but since the traffic need to traverse through openvpn server(Amazon VPS) there is a lot of delay/overhead and its consuming VPS network bandwidth, I have come to know that Tinc VPN supports spoke to spoke(full mesh) direct connection bypassing hub (so clients can reach other clients without going through a server) , can this be possible in my scenario? I am really looking out for a solution. Your help is appreciated. Thank you, Regards, Bobby Thomas. -------------- next part -----------...

Hi - Linux: Ubuntu 9.10 all updates applied as of 9/5/2010. Samba: 3.4.0 smb.conf global section: [global] netbios name=blahblahblah sever string=Domain Master workgroup=blahblahblah encrypt passwords=true wins support=yes domain master=yes local master=yes preferred master=yes os level=255 security=user domain logons=yes passdb backend=smbpasswd logon script=%U.bat add machine script=sudo

On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Ah, depends on the image type. We spoke reset for an NBP though. ?! //mirabilos -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstra?e 2-4, D-53123 Bonn ? http://www.tarent.de/ Tel: +49 228 54881-393 ? Fax: +49 228 54881-235 HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) ? USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg

Hello Lartc Mailing List: Been working on something the last week and a half and ALMOST have it working.., just need a few pointers from the wizards on this mailing list to nail it. Ok, my setup is a hub and spoke arrangement, hub is Cisco 2821 with IOS 12.4. Spokes are ruggencom RX1000 routers, Debian based with the following versions installed: rx1000test:~# uname -a Linux rx1000test 2.6.8-16-486-rx #1 Wed Mar 15 15:33:23 UTC 2006 i586 GNU/Linux rx1000test:~# iptables -v iptables v1.2.11: no command speci...

...ks > swimmingly on Mac OS X. However, the Windows version has been a battle and > a half, and it’s now at the point where I need some assistance to progress. > > The problem I’m having is “Relocation overflow” (related: > https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23228#c8, see #8) … so I spoke to > some clang developers who focussed on Windows at CppCon last week, and they > gave me the following advice: > - Use ELF > - Using this results in another issue about comdat sections, see here: > https://root.cern.ch/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=19808 > - Stick with COFF, but us...

Thank you for your reply. If you happen to read the post of 11/22, you will notice that it was not me who spoke ill of Samba. I put my bets on other people being able to figure it out; I hope that one of them will help me. Sincerely jimc

...node, but there’re some other nodes in the topology act as the transit nodes. > > So if the tinc node forward subnet update it learning from one side to the other side, then it possible to become transit node if one side only have route to go through it. > > That node I would call it “spoke-only” node, which dual/triple connection go to multiple “hub” node, “hub” definitely need to forward traffic for the “spoke”, but “spoke” shouldn’t forward subnets learning from one “hub” to another. > > Any idea to achieve this in one tinc “network”? You can use the TunnelServer option on...

Thanks for all your help. I've been reading thru the tinc manual, but was having a hard time finding an explanation of the security/trust model. I'm interested in using tinc in a business production environment, so I just want to make sure I have it secured properly. Would spokes loose their connection we each other if the hub went offline? Also, what's the minimum required exchange for a node to connect to another? Do both nodes need to exchange public keys, or just one with the other?

On 12/03/2014 08:43 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> Ah, depends on the image type. We spoke reset for an NBP though. > > ?! > Should, not spoke. -hpa

...etailed 100+-page document detailing the internals of what these packets need to look like. But wouldn't it be nice if instead, you could use SIPAddHeader() with X tags and have Cisco pick off the out-of-band values from SIP packets? Wouldn't it be even nicer if there was a middleware that spoke GED-125 out of one side, and spoke SIP X headers on the other side? I will soon be able to tell you about the bowels of this interaction, but before I go down this road, does anybody want to speak up with lessons learned from doing this themselves? I'm assuming I'm going to end up creating...

Has anybody gotten :hard_breaks to work with RedCloth? I''m doing: self.body_html = RedCloth.new(self.body).to_html(:textile) which works, except that it doesn''t transform hard breaks to <br /> tags, which is really important for me. However, if I do: self.body_html = RedCloth.new(self.body, [ :hard_breaks ]).to_html(:textile) then it converts ALL breaks into <br

Hi Peoples I am having problems with meetme, in that it responds with "conf-invalid" when I dial a conference number. I notice that there is a note with regards to ztdummy, and the need for that to be loaded. Is this still the case? Is meetme dependent on this module? I do NOT use zaptel cards in my system, and there for zaptel is not loading. Can anyone shed some light

We've had a lot of churn in all the trunks (llvm, llvm-gcc, clang) recently, and the testing buildbots have been failing repeatedly. I spoke with Chris this AM, and he suggested we have a "stabilization day." Please avoid large, destabilizing changes for about twenty-four hours. We would like for the testing bots to begin working again. Thanks, stuart

...ort. Using gas will continue to work fine. > Anyway I wll report back when I have a proper overview of the area, > it would be good if you could also look into the problem so contact > me back if you are, also it maybe a good idea to share this with > Anton and Evan. I already spoke to anton. The MASM support is clearly broken, it generates .s files with typos for the directives and has other problems. Anton thinks it should be removed. -Chris

Hi all, First, this is not my first PRI/T1 Asterisk deployement. Did several with Bell, Telus, AllStream, Rogers but this is my first with Videotron. Just spoke with the person taking the order and on top of the standard settings (switch, coding,...) she asked me about data rate (56k or 64k). Since I have never been asked this question before and can find anything relevant in the configuration files, I would like to have your inputs on this. Thanks,...