Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "split_cach".
Did you mean:
split_cache
2020 Feb 10
1
[nbdkit PATCH] split: Add support for .extents
...s: %m", filenames[i]);
+ h->files[i].can_extents = false;
+ }
+ else
+ h->files[i].can_extents = true;
+#else
+ h->files[i].can_extents = false;
+#endif
}
h->size = offset;
nbdkit_debug ("total size=%" PRIu64, h->size);
@@ -319,6 +341,104 @@ split_cache (void *handle, uint32_t count, uint64_t offset, uint32_t flags)
}
#endif /* HAVE_POSIX_FADVISE */
+#ifdef SEEK_HOLE
+static int64_t
+do_extents (struct file *file, uint32_t count, uint64_t offset,
+ bool req_one, struct nbdkit_extents *extents)
+{
+ int64_t r = 0;
+ uint64_t end =...
2019 May 10
11
[nbdkit PATCH 0/9] RFC: implement NBD_CMD_CACHE
I'm still working my way through the filters before this series will
be complete, but this is enough of a start to at least get some
feedback on the idea of implementing another NBD protocol extension.
Eric Blake (9):
server: Internal hooks for implementing NBD_CMD_CACHE
plugins: Add .cache callback
file, split: Implement .cache with posix_fadvise
nbd: Implement NBD_CMD_CACHE
2019 May 16
27
[nbdkit PATCH v2 00/24] implement NBD_CMD_CACHE
Since v1:
- rework .can_cache to be tri-state, with default of no advertisement
(ripple effect through other patches)
- add a lot more patches in order to round out filter support
And in the meantime, Rich pushed NBD_CMD_CACHE support into libnbd, so
in theory we now have a way to test cache commands through the entire
stack.
Eric Blake (24):
server: Internal hooks for implementing