search for: splashi

Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "splashi".

Did you mean: splash
2007 Aug 02
0
Enabling a splash screen on Dom0 kernel
I''m trying to use Splashy (splashy.alioth.debian.org) to display a .png splash screen while the kernel boots under Xen Dom0 (Debian Etch). Splashy dies with "Splashy ERROR: Couldn''t splashy_start_splashy(). Error -2", which seems to me to be a problem with the fb driver (all other fb apps die as well with: "map: vt01 => fb0 can handle only packed pixel frame
2020 Apr 20
4
[PATCH v2] python: Fix UnicodeError in inspect_list_applications2() (RHBZ#1684004)
The python3 bindings create unicode objects from application strings on the guest (i.e. installed rpm, deb packages). It is documented that rpm package fields such as description should be utf8 encoded - however in some cases they are not a valid unicode string, on SLES11 SP4 the following packages fail to be converted to unicode using guestfs_int_py_fromstring() (which invokes
2020 Apr 20
2
[PATCH] python: Fix UnicodeError in inspect_list_applications2() (RHBZ#1684004)
The python3 bindings create unicode objects from application strings on the guest (i.e. installed rpm, deb packages). It is documented that rpm package fields such as description should be utf8 encoded - however in some cases they are not a valid unicode string, on SLES11 SP4 the following packages fail to be converted to unicode using guestfs_int_py_fromstring() (which invokes
2020 Apr 26
5
[PATCH v3] python: Fix UnicodeError in inspect_list_applications2() (RHBZ#1684004)
The python3 bindings create PyUnicode objects from application strings on the guest (i.e. installed rpm, deb packages). It is documented that rpm package fields such as description should be utf8 encoded - however in some cases they are not a valid unicode string, on SLES11 SP4 the encoding of the description of the following packages is latin1 and they fail to be converted to unicode using
2020 Jun 03
2
Re: [PATCH v3] python: Fix UnicodeError in inspect_list_applications2() (RHBZ#1684004)
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:06 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 09:14:03PM +0300, Sam Eiderman wrote: > > The python3 bindings create PyUnicode objects from application strings > > on the guest (i.e. installed rpm, deb packages). > > It is documented that rpm package fields such as description should be > > utf8 encoded
2020 Apr 20
0
[PATCH] python: Fix UnicodeError in inspect_list_applications2() (RHBZ#1684004)
The python3 bindings create unicode objects from application strings on the guest (i.e. installed rpm, deb packages). It is documented that rpm package fields such as description should be utf8 encoded - however in some cases they are not a valid unicode string, on SLES11 SP4 the following packages fail to be converted to unicode using guestfs_int_py_fromstring() (which invokes
2020 Apr 20
0
Re: [PATCH] python: Fix UnicodeError in inspect_list_applications2() (RHBZ#1684004)
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 01:17:35PM +0300, Sam Eiderman wrote: > The python3 bindings create unicode objects from application strings > on the guest (i.e. installed rpm, deb packages). > It is documented that rpm package fields such as description should be > utf8 encoded - however in some cases they are not a valid unicode > string, on SLES11 SP4 the following packages fail to be
2020 Apr 20
0
Re: [PATCH v2] python: Fix UnicodeError in inspect_list_applications2() (RHBZ#1684004)
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 03:37:16PM +0300, Sam Eiderman wrote: > The python3 bindings create unicode objects from application strings > on the guest (i.e. installed rpm, deb packages). > It is documented that rpm package fields such as description should be > utf8 encoded - however in some cases they are not a valid unicode > string, on SLES11 SP4 the following packages fail to be
2020 Apr 23
0
Re: [PATCH v2] python: Fix UnicodeError in inspect_list_applications2() (RHBZ#1684004)
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 3:38 PM Sam Eiderman <sameid@google.com> wrote: > > The python3 bindings create unicode objects from application strings > on the guest (i.e. installed rpm, deb packages). > It is documented that rpm package fields such as description should be > utf8 encoded - however in some cases they are not a valid unicode > string, So what are they? latin1
2020 May 13
0
Re: [PATCH v3] python: Fix UnicodeError in inspect_list_applications2() (RHBZ#1684004)
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 09:14:03PM +0300, Sam Eiderman wrote: > The python3 bindings create PyUnicode objects from application strings > on the guest (i.e. installed rpm, deb packages). > It is documented that rpm package fields such as description should be > utf8 encoded - however in some cases they are not a valid unicode > string, on SLES11 SP4 the encoding of the description of
2020 Jun 30
0
Re: [PATCH v3] python: Fix UnicodeError in inspect_list_applications2() (RHBZ#1684004)
gentle ping On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 2:52 PM Sam Eiderman <sameid@google.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:06 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 09:14:03PM +0300, Sam Eiderman wrote: > > > The python3 bindings create PyUnicode objects from application strings > > > on the guest (i.e. installed
2020 Apr 25
1
Re: [PATCH v2] python: Fix UnicodeError in inspect_list_applications2() (RHBZ#1684004)
Hi Nir, I think latin1, How do you think we should handle latin1 errors then? Replace on latin1 or replace on utf-8? for codec in ["utf8", "latin1"]: try: return decode(b, codec) except: pass return decode(b, "utf8", errors="replace") (Pseudocode, will be implemented in c) On Thu, Apr 23, 2020, 21:34 Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com>
2011 Jul 09
0
Processed: raise severity of ftbfs with -Werror (please apologize for false positives, just close the report in this case)
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > severity 616296 serious Bug #616296 [src:btrfs-tools] btrfs-tools: will FTBFS with gcc-4.6 Bug #625312 [src:btrfs-tools] btrfs-tools: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 625392 serious Bug #625392 [mdadm] mdadm: ftbfs
2013 Apr 12
7
Syslinux "new" vs "old": strange difference on USB flash set-up
Hello, CONFIGURATION Syslinux "old": 3.36 Syslinux "new": 5.01 (B)LFS i686-pc-linux-gnu 3.8.0 Machine #1: ASUS P5E-VM HDMI. Latest BIOS. circa 3 years ago. Machine #2: ASUS P8H77-I. Latest BIOS. This year. USB Flash stick: Kingston "Data Traveler" 4GB. Clean (blank) STRANGE (UNEXPLAINED) syslinux BEHAVIOR DIFFERENCE Steps: 1. Set up KNOPPIX 7.05